Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22499666›Full record

ArticleGenome research2012

Disentangling the relationship between sex-biased gene expression and X-linkage.

Richard P Meisel, John H Malone, Andrew G Clark

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dichotomous transcriptome divergence at the cell-type level between thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Expression Divergence in Response to Sex-biased Selection.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evolution of sex-biased genes inEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sex-biased gene expression in nutrient-sensing pathways.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard P MeiselDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA. meisel@cornell.edu
John H Malone
Andrew G Clark
Cornell University · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Drosophila Functional GenomicsZIADK015600 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI OLIVER, BRIAN · 2009 to 2025
$23.9M
Molecular Evolution of Drosophila Y ChromosomeR01GM064590 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI CARVALHO, ANTONIO BERNARDO, CLARK, ANDREW G · 2002 to 2012
$2.0M
Gene Expression, Duplicated Genes, and Sex Bias in DrosophilaF32GM087611 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI MEISEL, RICHARD P. · 2008 to 2010
$143k
Intramural NIH HHSNIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM087611NIGMS NIH HHS F32GM087611NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM064590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X chromosomes are preferentially transmitted through females, which may favor the accumulation of X-linked alleles/genes with female-beneficial effects. Numerous studies have shown that genes with sex-biased expression are under- or over-represented on the X chromosomes of a wide variety of organisms. The patterns, however, vary between different animal species, and the causes of these differences are unresolved. Additionally, genes with sex-biased expression tend to be narrowly expressed in a limited number of tissues, and narrowly expressed genes are also non-randomly X-linked in a taxon-specific manner. It is therefore unclear whether the unique gene content of the X chromosome is the result of selection on genes with sex-biased expression, narrowly expressed genes, or some combination of the two. To address this problem, we measured sex-biased expression in multiple Drosophila species and at different developmental time points. These data were combined with available expression measurements from Drosophila melanogaster and mouse to reconcile the inconsistencies in X-chromosome content among taxa. Our results suggest that most of the differences between Drosophila and mammals are confounded by disparate data collection/analysis approaches as well as the correlation between sex bias and expression breadth. Both the Drosophila and mouse X chromosomes harbor an excess of genes with female-biased expression after controlling for the confounding factors, suggesting that the asymmetrical transmission of the X chromosome favors the accumulation of female-beneficial mutations in X-linked genes. However, some taxon-specific patterns remain, and we provide evidence that these are in part a consequence of constraints imposed by the dosage compensation mechanism in Drosophila.

Indexed as

Dosage Compensation, GeneticGenes, X-LinkedGenetic LinkageAnimalsChromosome MappingDrosophilaExpressed Sequence TagsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenes, InsectLarvaMaleMiceSelection, GeneticSex FactorsTestis

Identifiers

PMID22499666
PMCPMC3396367
OpenAlexW2100488854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.