Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22498923›Full record

Trial reportHealth education research2012

Real-time moment-to-moment emotional responses to narrative and informational breast cancer videos in African American women.

Sarah Bollinger, Matthew W Kreuter

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health education research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04450264 (Increasing African Immigrant's Breast Cancer Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
30.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04450264 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Increasing African Immigrant's Breast Cancer Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRan2020 to 2023Enrolled155ConditionsBreast CancerArmsAfrican Immigrant Breast Cancer Education Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stories in Games for Health: More Pros or Cons?Games for health journal · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah BollingerHealth Communication Research Laboratory, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St Louis, MO 63130, USA. sbollinger@wustl.edu
Matthew W Kreuter
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Training / Career DevelopmentP50CA095815 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KREUTER, MATTHEW W. · 2003 to 2012
$20.4M
GWB MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE RESEARCH TRAININGT32MH019960 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Leopoldo J Cabassa, Byron James Powell · 1995 to 2026
$11.1M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA095815NCI NIH HHS P50 CA095815-06NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a randomized experiment using moment-to-moment audience analysis methods, we compared women's emotional responses with a narrative versus informational breast cancer video. Both videos communicated three key messages about breast cancer: (i) understand your breast cancer risk, (ii) talk openly about breast cancer and (iii) get regular mammograms. A community-based convenience sample of African American women (n = 59) used a hand-held audience response device to report the intensity of their emotional reaction while watching one of the two videos. Strong emotions were more likely to correspond to contextual information about characters in the video and less likely to correspond to health content among women who watched the narrative video compared with those who watched the informational video (P < 0.05). Women who watched the narrative video were more likely to report feeling attentive (41 versus 28%, respectively), inspired (54 versus 34%) and proud (30 versus 18%) and less likely to feel upset (8 versus 16%) (all P < 0.05). Women in the narrative group were more likely to mention women's personal stories than health information in open-ended recall questions, but this did not detract from obtaining health information. Findings suggest that stories can be used to communicate health information without distracting from core health content.

Indexed as

EmotionsMammographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAttentionBlack or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMiddle AgedMotivationNarrationPatient Education as TopicRisk

Identifiers

PMID22498923
PMCPMC3337426
OpenAlexW2159407340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.