Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22498022›Full record

Trial reportPreventive medicine2012

A community-based randomized trial of a faith-placed intervention to reduce cervical cancer burden in Appalachia.

Christina R Studts, Yelena N Tarasenko, Nancy E Schoenberg, Brent J Shelton, Jennifer Hatcher-Keller, Mark B Dignan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Preventive medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Assessing the Effectiveness of Cancer Screening Interventions Targeting Appalachian Populations: A Systematic Review.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cancer Screening in Appalachia: A Common-Sense Approach.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Identifying risk factors for adverse lung health outcomes among rural Appalachian women.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  18. Cancer disparities in Appalachian Kentucky.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christina R StudtsDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA. tina.studts@uky.edu
Yelena N Tarasenko
Nancy E Schoenberg
Brent J Shelton
Jennifer Hatcher-Keller
Mark B Dignan
University of Kentucky · USMarkey Cancer Center · US

Funding

An Appalchian Cervical Cancer Prevention ProjectR01CA108696 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI SCHOENBERG, NANCY E · 2004 to 2007
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA108696NCI NIH HHS R01CA108696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFaith Moves Mountains assessed the effectiveness of a faith-placed lay health advisor (LHA) intervention to increase Papanicolaou (Pap) test use among middle-aged and older women in a region disproportionately affected by cervical cancer and low screening rates (regionally, only 68% screened in prior 3 years).

methodThis community-based RCT was conducted in four Appalachian Kentucky counties (December 2005-June 2008). Women aged 40-64 and overdue for screening were recruited from churches and individually randomized to treatment (n=176) or wait-list control (n=169). The intervention provided LHA home visits and newsletters addressing barriers to screening. Self-reported Pap test receipt was the primary outcome.

resultsIntention-to-treat analyses revealed that treatment group participants (17.6% screened) had over twice the odds of wait-list controls (11.2% screened) of reporting Pap test receipt post-intervention, OR=2.56, 95% CI: 1.03-6.38, p=0.04. Independent of group, recently screened participants (last Pap >1 but <5 years ago) had significantly higher odds of obtaining screening during the study than rarely or never screened participants (last Pap ≥5 years ago), OR=2.50, 95% CI: 1.48-4.25, p=0.001.

conclusionsThe intervention was associated with increased cervical cancer screening. The faith-placed LHA addressing barriers comprises a novel approach to reducing cervical cancer disparities among Appalachian women.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchCost of IllnessHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePapanicolaou TestAdultAppalachian RegionCommunity Health WorkersFaith HealingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKentuckyMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePancreatitis-Associated ProteinsPapillomavirus InfectionsPancreatitis-Associated Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22498022
PMCPMC3368037
OpenAlexW1994307834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.