Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22497509›Full record

ArticleXenotransplantation

Xenotransplantation-associated infectious risk: a WHO consultation.

Jay A Fishman, Linda Scobie, Yasuhiro Takeuchi

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Xenotransplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03695939 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

An Open-label Phase 1/2 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of realSKIN® (Skin Xenotransplant) for Complete Closure of Severe and Extensive Deep-Partial and Full-Thickness Burn Wounds

TypeinterventionalSponsorXenoTherapeutics, Inc.Ran2019 to 2023Enrolled25ConditionsDeep Full-thickness Burn Injury (Disorder)ArmsrealSKIN (skin xenotransplant), Human Cadaver Allograft
NCT06223269 phase3recruitingnot on this map

A Phase III Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of realSKIN® to Provide Complete Wound Closure of Mixed-Depth, Full-Thickness Burn Wounds as an Alternative to Autografting

TypeinterventionalSponsorXenoTherapeutics, Inc.Ran2024 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsBurns Degree Third, Burn (Disorder), Burn Degree Second, Thermal BurnArmsSkin Xenotransplant, Autograft(ing)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Biocompatibility of decellularized spinach leaves.npj biomedical innovations · 2025
    Article
  10. Ethical frontiers in liver transplantation.World journal of transplantation · 2024
    Review
  11. Cardiac Xenotransplantation: A Narrative Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Aspects of Regulation of Xenotransplantation in Europe.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jay A FishmanTransplantation Infectious Disease and Compromised Host Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. jfishman@partners.org
Linda Scobie
Yasuhiro Takeuchi
Glasgow Caledonian University · GBMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity College London · GB

Funding

XENOGRAFT TOLERANCE THROUGH MIXED CHIMERISMP01AI045897 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Megan Sykes · 2000 to 2026
$71.9M
Chief Scientist Office ETM/32NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI045897NIAID NIH HHS P01AI45897PHS HHS 2010A056237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xenotransplantation carries the potential risk of the transmission of infection with the cells or tissues of the graft. The degree of risk is unknown in the absence of clinical trials. The clinical application of xenotransplantation has important implications for infectious disease surveillance, both at the national and international levels. Preclinical data indicate that infectious disease events associated with clinical xenotransplantation from swine, should they occur, will be rare; data in human trials are limited but have demonstrated no transmission of porcine microorganisms including porcine endogenous retrovirus. Xenotransplantation will necessitate the development of surveillance programs to detect known infectious agents and, potentially, previously unknown or unexpected pathogens. The development of surveillance and safety programs for clinical trials in xenotransplantation is guided by a "Precautionary Principle," with the deployment of appropriate screening procedures and assays for source animals and xenograft recipients even in the absence of data suggesting infectious risk. All assays require training, standardization and validation, and sharing of laboratory methods and expertise to optimize the quality of the surveillance and diagnostic testing. Investigation of suspected xenogeneic infection events (xenosis, xenozoonosis) should be performed in collaboration with an expert data safety review panel and the appropriate public health and competent authorities. It should be considered an obligation of performance of xenotransplantation trials to report outcomes, including any infectious disease transmissions, in the scientific literature. Repositories of samples from source animals and from recipients prior to, and following xenograft transplantation are essential to the investigation of possible infectious disease events. Concerns over any potential hazards associated with xenotransplantation may overshadow potential benefits. Careful microbiological screening of source animals used as xenotransplant donors may enhance the safety of transplantation beyond that of allotransplant procedures. Xenogeneic tissues may be relatively resistant to infection by some human pathogens. Moreover, xenotransplantation may be made available at the time when patients require organ replacement on a clinical basis. Insights gained in studies of the microbiology and immunology of xenotransplantation will benefit transplant recipients in the future. This document summarizes approaches to disease surveillance in individual recipients of nonhuman tissues.

Indexed as

AnimalsEndogenous RetrovirusesHumansImmunocompromised HostInfectionsRisk FactorsSwineTransplantation, HeterologousWorld Health OrganizationZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID22497509
PMCPMC3768267
OpenAlexW1550449562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.