Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22496885›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2012

Effect of CCR5-Δ32 heterozygosity on HIV-1 susceptibility: a meta-analysis.

Sijie Liu, Chuijin Kong, Jie Wu, Hao Ying, Huanzhang Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in genetics · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. NK Cell Activity and CD57Frontiers in immunology · 2020
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Influence BetweenAIDS research and human retroviruses · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sijie LiuThe State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Institute of Genetics, School of Life Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chuijin Kong
Jie Wu
Hao Ying
Huanzhang Zhu
Fudan University · CNState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSo far, many studies have investigated the distribution of CCR5 genotype between HIV-1 infected patients and uninfected people. However, no definite results have been put forward about whether heterozygosity for a 32-basepair deletion in CCR5 gene (CCR5-Δ32) can affect HIV-1 susceptibility.

methodsWe performed a meta-analysis of 18 studies including more than 12000 subjects for whom the CCR5-Δ32 polymorphism was genotyped. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were employed to assess the association of CCR5-Δ32 polymorphism with HIV-1 susceptibility.

resultsCompared with the wild-type CCR5 homozygotes, the pooled OR for CCR5-Δ32 heterozygotes was 1.02 (95%CI, 0.88-1.19) for healthy controls (HC) and 0.95 (95%CI, 0.71-1.26) for exposed uninfected (EU) controls. Similar results were found in stratified analysis by ethnicity, sample size and method of CCR5-Δ32 genotyping.

conclusionsThe meta-analysis indicated that HIV-1 susceptibility is not significantly affected by heterozygosity for CCR5-Δ32.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseHeterozygoteHIV-1FemaleGenetic Association StudiesHIV InfectionsHumansMalePolymorphism, GeneticReceptors, CCR5Sequence DeletionReceptors, CCR5

Identifiers

PMID22496885
PMCPMC3320650
OpenAlexW2043023634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.