Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22496550›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2012

Comparative anatomy of marmoset and mouse cortex from genomic expression.

Hiromi Mashiko, Aya C Yoshida, Satomi S Kikuchi, Kimie Niimi, Eiki Takahashi, Jun Aruga, Hideyuki Okano, Tomomi Shimogori

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Translational Assessments of Reward Responsiveness in the Marmoset.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Differential Song Deficits after Lentivirus-Mediated Knockdown of FoxP1, FoxP2, or FoxP4 in Area X of Juvenile Zebra Finches.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. The use of nonhuman primates in studies of noise injury and treatment.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hiromi MashikoLaboratory for Molecular Mechanisms of Thalamus Development, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Wako, Saitama, Japan.
Aya C Yoshida
Satomi S Kikuchi
Kimie Niimi
Eiki Takahashi
Jun Aruga
Hideyuki Okano
Tomomi Shimogori
RIKEN · JPKeio University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in mouse neural circuit genetics, brain atlases, and behavioral assays provide a powerful system for modeling the genetic basis of cognition and psychiatric disease. However, a critical limitation of this approach is how to achieve concordance of mouse neurobiology with the ultimate goal of understanding the human brain. Previously, the common marmoset has shown promise as a genetic model system toward the linking of mouse and human studies. However, the advent of marmoset transgenic approaches will require an understanding of developmental principles in marmoset compared to mouse. In this study, we used gene expression analysis in marmoset brain to pose a series of fundamental questions on cortical development and evolution for direct comparison to existing mouse brain atlas expression data. Most genes showed reliable conservation of expression between marmoset and mouse. However, certain markers had strikingly divergent expression patterns. The lateral geniculate nucleus and pulvinar in the thalamus showed diversification of genetic organization between marmoset and mouse, suggesting they share some similarity. In contrast, gene expression patterns in early visual cortical areas showed marmoset-specific expression. In prefrontal cortex, some markers labeled architectonic areas and layers distinct between mouse and marmoset. Core hippocampus was conserved, while afferent areas showed divergence. Together, these results indicate that existing cortical areas are genetically conserved between marmoset and mouse, while differences in areal parcellation, afferent diversification, and layer complexity are associated with specific genes. Collectively, we propose that gene expression patterns in marmoset brain reveal important clues to the principles underlying the molecular evolution of cortical and cognitive expansion.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain ChemistryBrain MappingCallithrixCerebral CortexFemaleGene ExpressionGenetic MarkersGeniculate BodiesGenomicsHippocampusImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIn Situ HybridizationMaleMicePolymerase Chain ReactionGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID22496550
PMCPMC6622108
OpenAlexW2060789079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.