Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22496517›Full record

ArticleGenome research2012

Genetic dissection of a model complex trait using the Drosophila Synthetic Population Resource.

Elizabeth G King, Chris M Merkes, Casey L McNeil, Steven R Hoofer, Saunak Sen, Karl W Broman, Anthony D Long, Stuart J Macdonald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 155 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
155citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

155 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth G KingDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, USA.
Chris M Merkes
Casey L McNeil
Steven R Hoofer
Saunak Sen
Karl W Broman
Anthony D Long
Stuart J Macdonald

Funding

A resource for the genetic analysis of complex traitsR01RR024862 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI MACDONALD, STUART JOHN · 2008 to 2011
$2.5M
Statistical Methods and Software for QTL MappingR01GM074244 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BROMAN, KARL W · 2005 to 2013
$2.3M
Drosophila as a model for chemotherapy pharmacogenomicsR01GM085251 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LONG, ANTHONY DOUGLAS · 2009 to 2012
$1.3M
Statistical Methods for Experimental Genome PopulationsR01GM078338 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SEN, SAUNAK · 2007 to 2011
$1.1M
A Genomic Analysis of Sexual Trait Variation Within and Between SpeciesR01GM085260 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI MACDONALD, STUART JOHN · 2010 to 2013
$1.0M
NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR024862NCRR NIH HHS RR024862NIGMS NIH HHS GM074244NIGMS NIH HHS GM078338NIGMS NIH HHS GM085251NIGMS NIH HHS GM085260NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074244NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078338NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085251NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic dissection of complex, polygenic trait variation is a key goal of medical and evolutionary genetics. Attempts to identify genetic variants underlying complex traits have been plagued by low mapping resolution in traditional linkage studies, and an inability to identify variants that cumulatively explain the bulk of standing genetic variation in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Thus, much of the heritability remains unexplained for most complex traits. Here we describe a novel, freely available resource for the Drosophila community consisting of two sets of recombinant inbred lines (RILs), each derived from an advanced generation cross between a different set of eight highly inbred, completely resequenced founders. The Drosophila Synthetic Population Resource (DSPR) has been designed to combine the high mapping resolution offered by multiple generations of recombination, with the high statistical power afforded by a linkage-based design. Here, we detail the properties of the mapping panel of >1600 genotyped RILs, and provide an empirical demonstration of the utility of the approach by genetically dissecting alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) enzyme activity. We confirm that a large fraction of the variation in this classic quantitative trait is due to allelic variation at the Adh locus, and additionally identify several previously unknown modest-effect trans-acting QTL (quantitative trait loci). Using a unique property of multiparental linkage mapping designs, for each QTL we highlight a relatively small set of candidate causative variants for follow-up work. The DSPR represents an important step toward the ultimate goal of a complete understanding of the genetics of complex traits in the Drosophila model system.

Indexed as

Quantitative Trait, HeritableAlcohol DehydrogenaseAllelesAnimalsChromosome MappingCrosses, GeneticDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEnzyme ActivationFemaleGene FrequencyGenetic VariationGenotyping TechniquesInbreedingMaleModels, AnimalADH protein, DrosophilaAlcohol DehydrogenaseDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22496517
PMCPMC3409269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.