Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22496163›Full record

Trial reportBlood2012

Epigenetic reprogramming reverses the relapse-specific gene expression signature and restores chemosensitivity in childhood B-lymphoblastic leukemia.

Teena Bhatla, Jinhua Wang, Debra J Morrison, Elizabeth A Raetz, Michael J Burke, Patrick Brown, William L Carroll

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Age-Driven Genetic and Epigenetic Heterogeneity in B-ALL.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Teena BhatlaNew York University Cancer Institute, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Jinhua Wang
Debra J Morrison
Elizabeth A Raetz
Michael J Burke
Patrick Brown
William L Carroll
NYU Langone Health · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Minnesota Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Vaccine FacilityP30CA016087 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ADRIANA HEGUY · 1985 to 2026
$83.1M
Drug Resistant Pathways in Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia(ALL)R01CA140729 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CARROLL, WILLIAM L. · 2010 to 2020
$4.8M
A Pilot Study of Decitabine and Vorinostat with Chemotherapy for Relapsed ALLR21CA161688 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BROWN, PATRICK A, BURKE, MICHAEL JAMES · 2011 to 2012
$682k
NCI NIH HHS 5 P30 CA16087-30NCI NIH HHS 5 R01CA 140729-02NCI NIH HHS K12 NCI CA96028NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016087NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140729NCI NIH HHS R21 CA161688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whereas the improvement in outcome for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia has been gratifying, the poor outcome of patients who relapse warrants novel treatment approaches. Previously, we identified a characteristic relapse-specific gene expression and methylation signature associated with chemoresistance using a large cohort of matched-diagnosis relapse samples. We hypothesized that "reversing" such a signature might restore chemosensitivity. In the present study, we demonstrate that the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat not only reprograms the aberrant gene expression profile of relapsed blasts by epigenetic mechanisms, but is also synergistic when applied before chemotherapy in primary patient samples and leukemia cell lines. Furthermore, incorporation of the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor decitabine led to reexpression of genes shown to be preferentially methylated and silenced at relapse. Combination pretreatment with vorinostat and decitabine resulted in even greater cytotoxicity compared with each agent individually with chemotherapy. Our results indicate that acquisition of chemo-resistance at relapse may be driven in part by epigenetic mechanisms. Incorporation of these targeted epigenetic agents to the standard chemotherapy backbone is a promising approach to the treatment of relapsed pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAzacitidineBlast CrisisCell Line, TumorChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDecitabineDNA MethylationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, LeukemicGene SilencingHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansHydroxamic AcidsLeukemia, B-CellAzacitidineDecitabineHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHydroxamic AcidsVorinostat

Identifiers

PMID22496163
PMCPMC3369610
OpenAlexW2050567053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.