Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22495933›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2012

Characterization of a novel DNA polymerase activity assay enabling sensitive, quantitative and universal detection of viable microbes.

Daniel R Zweitzig, Nichol M Riccardello, Bruce I Sodowich, S Mark O'Hara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel R ZweitzigZEUS Scientific Incorporated, Research and Development, 200 Evans Way, Branchburg, NJ 08876, USA.
Nichol M Riccardello
Bruce I Sodowich
S Mark O'Hara
Zeus Scientific (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the past 50 years, in vitro measurement of DNA polymerase activity has become an essential molecular biology tool. Traditional methods used to measure DNA polymerase activity in vitro are undesirable due to the usage of radionucleotides. Fluorescence-based DNA polymerase assays have been developed; however, they also suffer from various limitations. Herein we present a rapid, highly sensitive and quantitative assay capable of measuring DNA polymerase extension activity from purified enzymes or directly from microbial lysates. When tested with purified DNA polymerase, the assay detected as little as 2 × 10(-11)U of enzyme (∼ 50 molecules), while demonstrating excellent linearity (R(2)=0.992). The assay was also able to detect endogenous DNA polymerase extension activity down to less than 10 colony forming units (cfu) of input Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria when coupled to bead mill lysis while maintaining an R(2)=0.999. Furthermore, preliminary evidence presented here suggests that DNA polymerase extension activity is an indicator of microbial viability, as demonstrated by the reproducibly strong concordance between assay signal and bacterial colony formation. Together, the innovative methodology described here represents a significant advancement toward sensitive detection of potentially any microorganism containing active DNA polymerase within a given sample matrix.

Indexed as

BacteriaDeoxycytosine NucleotidesDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseEnzyme AssaysMicrobial ViabilityPolymerase Chain Reaction2'-deoxycytidine 5'-triphosphateDeoxycytosine NucleotidesDNA-Directed DNA Polymerase

Identifiers

PMID22495933
PMCPMC3413125
OpenAlexW2151120424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.