Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22494224›Full record

ArticleThe American journal on addictions

Delay discounting, locus of control, and cognitive impulsiveness independently predict tobacco dependence treatment outcomes in a highly dependent, lower socioeconomic group of smokers.

Christine Sheffer, James Mackillop, John McGeary, Reid Landes, Lawrence Carter, Richard Yi, Bryan Jones, Darren Christensen, Maxine Stitzer, Lisa Jackson and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal on addictions. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
17.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 262 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. A web-based episodic specificity and future thinking session modulates delay discounting in cannabis users.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2020
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Cue-induced craving increases impulsivity via changes in striatal value signals in problem gamblers.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Trial

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Christine ShefferDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Education, College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
James Mackillop
John McGeary
Reid Landes
Lawrence Carter
Richard Yi
Bryan Jones
Darren Christensen
Maxine Stitzer
Lisa Jackson
Warren Bickel
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USBrown University · USJohns Hopkins University · USKent State University at Ashtabula · USUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR029884 · NCRR · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI LOWERY, CURTIS L · 2009 to 2011
$11.4M
Translational Training in AddictionT32DA022981 · NIDA · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI Melissa Jean Zielinski · 2009 to 2026
$6.1M
Soft Commitment as a Mechanism to Prevent Preference Reversals in SmokersR01DA011692 · NIDA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI YI, RICHARD · 1999 to 2013
$3.8M
The Behavioral Economics of RelapseR01DA022386 · NIDA · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI SHEFFER, CHRISTINE ELIZABETH · 2007 to 2010
$1.5M
Enhancing Alcoholism Pharmacotherapy Research via Behavioral EconomicsK23AA016936 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI MACKILLOP, JAMES · 2008 to 2012
$805k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR029884NIAAA NIH HHS 5K23AA016936NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA016936NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA023847NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA011692NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022386NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022386-01PHS HHS NCRR20146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tobacco use disproportionately affects lower socioeconomic status (SES) groups. Current explanations as to why lower SES groups respond less robustly to tobacco control efforts and tobacco dependence treatment do not fully account for this disparity. The identification of factors that predict relapse in this population might help to clarify these differences. Good candidates for novel prognostic factors include the constellation of behaviors associated with executive function including self-control/impulsiveness, the propensity to delay reward, and consideration and planning of future events. This study examined the ability of several measures of executive function and other key clinical, psychological, and cognitive factors to predict abstinence for highly dependent lower SES participants enrolled in intensive cognitive-behavioral treatment for tobacco dependence. Consistent with predictions, increased discounting and impulsiveness, an external locus of control as well as greater levels of nicotine dependence, stress, and smoking for negative affect reduction predicted relapse. These findings suggest that these novel factors are clinically relevant in predicting treatment outcomes and suggest new targets for therapeutic assessment and treatment approaches.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionInternal-External ControlSocial ClassAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansImpulsive BehaviorMaleMiddle AgedRewardSmoking CessationTobacco Use DisorderTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22494224
PMCPMC3567840
OpenAlexW2123851557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.