Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22493688›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

A rapid, cost-effective method of assembly and purification of synthetic DNA probes >100 bp.

Michael A Jensen, Lauren Jauregui, Ronald W Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael A JensenStanford Genome Technology Center, Palo Alto, California, United States of America. m.a.jensen@stanford.edu
Lauren Jauregui
Ronald W Davis

Funding

WHOLE YEAST GENOME TRANSCRIPTIONAL AND FUNCTIONAL GENE MAPS--A FEASIBILITY STUDYP01HG000205 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, RONALD WAYNE, HOWE, ROGER THOMAS · 1990 to 2016
$120.9M
A Strategy for High Quality Clinical Resequencing of the Human GenomeRC2HG005570 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, RONALD WAYNE · 2009 to 2010
$2.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS P01 HG000205NHGRI NIH HHS RC2 HG005570NHGRI NIH HHS RC2 HG005570-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we introduce a rapid, cost-effective method of generating molecular DNA probes in just under 15 minutes without the need for expensive, time-consuming gel-extraction steps. As an example, we enzymatically concatenated six variable strands (50 bp) with a common strand sequence (51 bp) in a single pool using Fast-Link DNA ligase to produce 101 bp targets (10 min). Unincorporated species were then filtered out by passing the crude reaction through a size-exclusion column (<5 min). We then compared full-length product yield of crude and purified samples using HPLC analysis; the results of which clearly show our method yields three-quarters that of the crude sample (50% higher than by gel-extraction). And while we substantially reduced the amount of unligated product with our filtration process, higher purity and yield, with an increase in number of stands per reaction (>12) could be achieved with further optimization. Moreover, for large-scale assays, we envision this method to be fully automated with the use of robotics such as the Biomek FX; here, potentially thousands of samples could be pooled, ligated and purified in either a 96, 384 or 1536-well platform in just minutes.

Indexed as

Base SequenceChromatography, GelChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCost-Benefit AnalysisDNA Ligase ATPDNA LigasesDNA ProbesDNA, Single-StrandedMolecular Sequence DataOligodeoxyribonucleotidesDNA Ligase ATPDNA LigasesDNA ProbesDNA, Single-StrandedOligodeoxyribonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID22493688
PMCPMC3321010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.