ArticlePloS one2012
Inferring phylogenies from RAD sequence data.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
87 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phylogenetics withinPeerJ · 2026Article
- Ultraconserved Elements and Machine Learning Classifiers Enable Robust Phylogenetics and Taxonomy in Model and Non-Model Nematodes.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- Hybridization as driving force for cryptic species diversity in the Caribbean coral genus Madracis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- NewtCap: An Efficient Target Capture Approach to Boost Genomic Studies in Salamandridae (True Salamanders and Newts).Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- When the sand blossoms: Phylogeny, trait evolution, and geography of speciation in Linanthus.American journal of botany · 2025Article
- Development of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP)-Based Species-Specific Real-Time PCR Assays for Authenticating Five Highly Priced Tuna.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Sampling strategies for genotyping common bean (Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Estimation of species divergence times in presence of cross-species gene flow.Systematic biology · 2023Article
- A New Assessment of Robust Capuchin Monkey (Genes · 2023Article
- 2b or not 2b? 2bRAD is an effective alternative to ddRAD for phylogenomics.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Regulation of feather follicle development and Msx2 gene SNP degradation in Hungarian white goose.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- An overlooked dispersal route of Cardueae (Asteraceae) from the Mediterranean to East Asia revealed by phylogenomic and biogeographical analyses of Atractylodes.Annals of botany · 2022Article
- Combined use of specific length amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq) and bulked segregant analysis (BSA) for rapid identification of genes influencing fiber content of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.).BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- A simulation study to examine the impact of recombination on phylogenomic inferences under the multispecies coalescent model.Molecular ecology · 2022Article
- Population genomics for symbiotic anthozoans: can reduced representation approaches be used for taxa without reference genomes?Heredity · 2022Article
- The phylogeographic history ofEcology and evolution · 2022Article
- Phylogeographic structure ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Diversification of chiles (Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Integrating Sequence Capture and Restriction Site-Associated DNA Sequencing to Resolve Recent Radiations of Pelagic Seabirds.Systematic biology · 2021Article
- HyRAD-X Exome Capture Museomics Unravels Giant Ground Beetle Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reduced-representation genome sequencing represents a new source of data for systematics, and its potential utility in interspecific phylogeny reconstruction has not yet been explored. One approach that seems especially promising is the use of inexpensive short-read technologies (e.g., Illumina, SOLiD) to sequence restriction-site associated DNA (RAD)--the regions of the genome that flank the recognition sites of restriction enzymes. In this study, we simulated the collection of RAD sequences from sequenced genomes of different taxa (Drosophila, mammals, and yeasts) and developed a proof-of-concept workflow to test whether informative data could be extracted and used to accurately reconstruct "known" phylogenies of species within each group. The workflow consists of three basic steps: first, sequences are clustered by similarity to estimate orthology; second, clusters are filtered by taxonomic coverage; and third, they are aligned and concatenated for "total evidence" phylogenetic analysis. We evaluated the performance of clustering and filtering parameters by comparing the resulting topologies with well-supported reference trees and we were able to identify conditions under which the reference tree was inferred with high support. For Drosophila, whole genome alignments allowed us to directly evaluate which parameters most consistently recovered orthologous sequences. For the parameter ranges explored, we recovered the best results at the low ends of sequence similarity and taxonomic representation of loci; these generated the largest supermatrices with the highest proportion of missing data. Applications of the method to mammals and yeasts were less successful, which we suggest may be due partly to their much deeper evolutionary divergence times compared to Drosophila (crown ages of approximately 100 and 300 versus 60 Mya, respectively). RAD sequences thus appear to hold promise for reconstructing phylogenetic relationships in younger clades in which sufficient numbers of orthologous restriction sites are retained across species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.