ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2012
High survivorship of cemented sockets with roof graft for severe acetabular dysplasia.
Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Femoral head and neck autograft in arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review of long-term outcomes.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Acetabular Revision with Structural Allograft and Cemented Acetabular Component: A Retrospective Case Series of 13 Patients.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty in an Adult without Osteotomy for Neglected Developmental Dysplasia of Hip.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2023Article
- The roof step cut: A novel technique for bony reconstruction of acetabular roof deficiency during total hip replacement.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2022Article
- Risk factors for a radiolucent line around the acetabular component with an interface bioactive bone cement technique after primary cemented total hip arthroplasty.Bone & joint open · 2021Article
- Minimum 5 year follow-up of clinical and radiographic results of cemented acetabular components with an interface bioactive bone cement technique in primary cemented total hip arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2021Article
- Current concepts in developmental dysplasia of the hip and Total hip arthroplasty.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2019Review
- Reliability of the acetabular reconstruction technique using autogenous bone graft from resected femoral head in hip dysplasia: Influence of the change of hip joint center on clinical outcome.Journal of orthopaedics · 2017Article
- Long-term results of acetabular reconstruction using three bulk bone graft techniques in cemented total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia.International orthopaedics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocket fixation in patients with acetabular dysplasia can be technically demanding but the use of structural grafts can help to reconstruct the original center of hip rotation. Because reported survival rates differ, construct survival seems to depend on the technique of graft preparation and fixation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: What is the survivorship of cemented sockets with acetabular roof graft in patients with severe acetabular dysplasia? Do clinical scores equal those of patients without acetabular grafting?
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 62 patients (74 hips) who had undergone cemented THA with acetabular roof graft. Mean age at surgery was 45 years (range, 19-71 years). Revisions and radiographic failures were determined and clinical scores (Oxford, SF-12) were obtained and matched to a control group. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine survivorship at a minimum followup of 5 years (mean, 10.4 years; range, 5-16 years).
resultsSurvivorship for all-cause revision was 98% (95% CI, 92.5%-100.0%) at 10 years followup. Two hips were revised for aseptic acetabular loosening and one hip for polyethylene wear. All grafts incorporated and no additional radiographic loosenings were seen. Patients with grafting had higher Oxford scores compared with the control group but other scores were equal.
conclusionsIn contrast to reported series and the common use of cementless cups in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip, we found high survivorship of cemented sockets with roof graft in severe acetabular dysplasia at a mean followup of more than 10 years. These patients showed higher Oxford scores than patients in a control group. This technique that restores bone stock is a reasonable solution for often young patients with dysplasia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.