Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22491538›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery2012

Impact of prehospital mode of transport after severe injury: a multicenter evaluation from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium.

Eileen M Bulger, Danielle Guffey, Francis X Guyette, Russell D MacDonald, Karen Brasel, Jeffery D Kerby, Joseph P Minei, Craig Warden, Sandro Rizoli, Laurie J Morrison and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02440373 (Plasma Cytochrome c as Biomarker of Traumatic Injury and Predictor of Outcome), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02440373 completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Plasma Cytochrome c as Biomarker of Traumatic Injury and Predictor of Outcome

TypeobservationalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2014 to 2017Enrolled12ConditionsTrauma, Blunt Injury, Blunt Trauma, Accident
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Transport and destination hospital for patients with suspected multiple and/or severe injuries - a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Helicopter emergency medical services for adults with major trauma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Mortality rates in Norwegian HEMS-a retrospective analysis from Central Norway.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Defining geographic emergency medical services coverage in trauma systems.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparing population and incident data for optimal air ambulance base locations in Norway.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Epidemiological comparison between the Navarra Major Trauma Registry and the German Trauma Registry (TR-DGU®).Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2017
    Article
  19. Multicenter observational prehospital resuscitation on helicopter study.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2017
    Observational
  20. Exploring optimal air ambulance base locations in Norway using advanced mathematical modelling.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Eileen M BulgerDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98005, USA. ebulger@u.washington.edu
Danielle Guffey
Francis X Guyette
Russell D MacDonald
Karen Brasel
Jeffery D Kerby
Joseph P Minei
Craig Warden
Sandro Rizoli
Laurie J Morrison
Graham Nichol
Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Investigators

Funding

Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Data Coordinating CenterU01HL077863 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MAY, SUSANNE · 2004 to 2015
$125.1M
Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Regional Clinical Center-PittsburghU01HL077871 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CALLAWAY, CLIFTON W. · 2004 to 2015
$4.0M
Southeastern Resucitation Research CenterU01HL077881 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI KERBY, JEFFREY D, WANG, HENRY E. · 2004 to 2015
$3.9M
Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Regional Clinical Center-PortlandU01HL077873 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DAYA, MOHAMUD RAMZANALI · 2004 to 2015
$3.9M
Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Regional Clinical Center-DFW Center for ResusciU01HL077887 · NHLBI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI IDRIS, AHAMED H · 2004 to 2015
$3.2M
Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Regional Clinical Centers-MilwaukeeU01HL077866 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI AUFDERHEIDE, TOM PAUL · 2004 to 2015
$3.0M
Seattle-King County Center for Resuscitation ResearchU01HL077867 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KUDENCHUK, PETER JAMES · 2004 to 2015
$3.0M
The UCSD/San Diego Resuscitation Research CenterU01HL077908 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI VILKE, GARY · 2004 to 2015
$2.9M
Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Regional Clinical Center-OTTAWA-OPALS-BCRU01HL077885 · NHLBI · OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STIELL, IAN G. · 2004 to 2015
$2.4M
Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Regional Clinical Center-Toronto RegionalU01HL077872 · NHLBI · ST. MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL · PI MORRISON, LAURIE · 2004 to 2015
$1.9M
The Iowa Resuscitation Network:A Rural Regional Clin CtrU01HL077865 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI KERBER, RICHARD E · 2004 to 2007
$1.7M
CIHRNHLBI NIH HHS 5U01 HL077863NHLBI NIH HHS HL077865NHLBI NIH HHS HL077866NHLBI NIH HHS HL077867NHLBI NIH HHS HL077871NHLBI NIH HHS HL077872NHLBI NIH HHS HL077873NHLBI NIH HHS HL077881NHLBI NIH HHS HL077885NHLBI NIH HHS HL077887NHLBI NIH HHS HL077908NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL077863NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL077865NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL077866NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL077867NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL077871NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL077872NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL077873NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL077881NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL077885NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL077887NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL077908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is ongoing controversy about the relative effectiveness of air medical versus ground transportation for severely injured patients. In some systems, air medical crews may provide a higher level of care but may require longer transport times. We sought to evaluate the impact of mode of transport on outcome based on analysis of data from two randomized trials of prehospital hypertonic resuscitation.

methodsInjured patients were enrolled based on prehospital evidence of hypovolemic shock (systolic blood pressure ≤70 mm Hg or systolic blood pressure = 71-90 mm Hg with heart rate ≥108 bpm) or severe traumatic brain injury (TBI; Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤8). Patient demographics, injury severity, and physiology were compared based on mode of transport. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the impact of mode of transport on 24-hour and 28-day survival for all patients and 6-month extended Glasgow Outcome Scale for patients with TBI, adjusting for differences in injury severity.

resultsIncluded were 2,049 patients, of which 703 (34%) were transported by air. Patients transported by air were more severely injured (mean Injury Severity Score, 30.3 vs. 22.8; p < 0.001), more likely to be in the TBI cohort (70% vs. 55.4%; p < 0.001), and more likely blunt mechanism (94.0% vs. 78.1%; p < 0.001). Patients transported by air had higher rates of prehospital intubation (81% vs. 36%; p < 0.001), received more intravenous fluids (mean 1.3 L vs. 0.8 L; p < 0.001), and had longer prehospital times (mean 76.1 minutes vs. 43.5 minutes; p < 0.001). Adjusted analysis revealed no significant impact of mode of transport on survival or 6-month neurologic outcome (air transport-28-day survival: odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.51; 6-month extended Glasgow Outcome Scale score ≤4: odds ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-1.31).

conclusionThere was no difference in the adjusted clinical outcome according to mode of transport. However, air medical transported more severely injured patients with more advanced life support procedures and longer prehospital time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

AdultBrain InjuriesCanadaEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInjury Severity ScoreMaleProspective StudiesResuscitationShock, TraumaticSurvival RateTime FactorsTransportation of PatientsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22491538
PMCPMC3495608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.