Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22491468›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2012

Residues within the C-terminal arm of the herpes simplex virus 1 glycoprotein B ectodomain contribute to its refolding during the fusion step of virus entry.

Sarah A Connolly, Richard Longnecker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The structural basis of herpesvirus entry.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  7. Entry of Alphaherpesviruses.Current issues in molecular biology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Herpes simplex virus Membrane Fusion.Advances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah A ConnollyThe Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Richard Longnecker
Northwestern University · US

Funding

HERPESVIRUS GENE EXPRESSION IN TRANSFORMED CELLSR01CA021776 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LONGNECKER, RICHARD M · 1985 to 2017
$4.2M
EBV gB Function in Viral Fusion, Entry, and EgressR01AI067048 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI LONGNECKER, RICHARD M · 2007 to 2011
$1.9M
HERPESVIRUS GENE EXPRESSION IN TRANSFORMED CELLSR37CA021776 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SPEAR, PATRICIA G · 1987 to 1994
–
NCI NIH HHS CA021776NCI NIH HHS R01 CA021776NIAID NIH HHS AI067048NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI067048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herpesvirus entry into cells requires coordinated interactions among several viral glycoproteins. The final membrane fusion step of entry is executed by glycoprotein B (gB), a class III viral fusion protein that is conserved across all herpesviruses. Fusion proteins are metastable proteins that mediate fusion by inserting into a target membrane and refolding from a prefusion to postfusion conformation to bring the viral and cell membranes together. Although the structure of gB has been solved in a conformation that likely represents its postfusion form, its prefusion structure and the details of how it refolds to execute fusion are unknown. The postfusion gB structure contains a trimeric coiled-coil at its core and a long C-terminal arm within the ectodomain packs against this coil in an antiparallel manner. This coil-arm complex is reminiscent of the six-helix bundle that provides the energy for fusion in class I fusogens. To determine the role of the coil-arm complex, we individually mutated residues in the herpes simplex virus 1 gB coil-arm complex to alanine and assessed the contribution of each residue to cell-cell and virus-cell fusion. Several coil mutations resulted in a loss of cell surface expression, indicating that the coil residues are important for proper processing of gB. Three mutations in the arm region (I671A, H681A, and F683A) reduced fusion without affecting expression. Combining these three arm mutations drastically reduced the ability of gB to execute fusion; however, fusion function could be restored by adding known hyperfusogenic mutations to the arm mutant. We propose that the formation of the coil-arm complex drives the gB transition to a postfusion conformation and the coil-arm complex performs a function similar to that of the six-helix bundle in class I fusion. Furthermore, we suggest that these specific mutations in the arm may energetically favor the prefusion state of gB.

Indexed as

Protein RefoldingVirus InternalizationCell LineHerpes SimplexHerpesvirus 1, HumanHumansProtein Structure, TertiaryViral Envelope Proteinsglycoprotein B, Felid herpesvirus 1Viral Envelope Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22491468
PMCPMC3393567
OpenAlexW2137376139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.