Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22491407›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2012

Effect of biopsy location and size on proliferative capacity of ex vivo expanded conjunctival tissue.

Jon R Eidet, Ida G Fostad, Marie A Shatos, Tor P Utheim, Øygunn A Utheim, Sten Raeder, Darlene A Dartt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tcf7l2 localization of putative stem/progenitor cells in mouse conjunctiva.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2016
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jon R EidetSchepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA. j.r.eidet@gmail.com
Ida G Fostad
Marie A Shatos
Tor P Utheim
Øygunn A Utheim
Sten Raeder
Darlene A Dartt
Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · USCenter for Clinical Research (United States) · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

Conjunctival Goblet Cell Mucin Secretion in Inflammation and Its ResolutionR01EY019470 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI DARTT, DARLENE A · 2009 to 2023
$7.4M
CONTROL OF CONJUNCTIVAL GOBLET CELL MUCOUS PRODUCTIONR01EY009057 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI DARTT, DARLENE A · 1991 to 2009
$3.2M
NEI NIH HHS EY009057NEI NIH HHS EY019470,NEI NIH HHS R01 EY009057NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effect of location and size of biopsy on phenotype and proliferative capacity of cultured rat conjunctival epithelial cells.

methodsPieces of conjunctiva were used from six areas: superior and inferior areas of bulbus, fornix, and tarsus of male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 6). Explants were grown in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal bovine serum on coverslips for 8 days or assayed for colony-forming efficiency (n = 9). Analysis included immunofluorescence microscopy and outgrowth measurements with ImageJ software. The Mann-Whitney test and Spearman's rank-order correlation test were used.

resultsSuperior (23.9 ± 2.9-fold growth) and inferior (22.4 ± 1.2-fold growth) forniceal tissues yielded significantly more outgrowth with respect to explant size than superior bulbar (13.4 ± 1.9-fold growth; P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively), inferior bulbar (13.6 ± 1.6-fold growth; P = 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively), and inferior tarsal tissues (14.0 ± 1.3-fold growth; P = 0.01). Outgrowth size correlated positively with explant size (r(s) = 0.54; P < 0.001), whereas explant size correlated negatively with fold growth (r(s) = 0.36; P < 0.001). Superior forniceal cells displayed higher colony-forming efficiency (3.6% ± 0.9%) than superior bulbar (1.1% ± 0.3%; P < 0.05) and inferior bulbar cells (1.6% ± 0.8%; P < 0.05). Percentage of p63+ and PCNA+ cells correlated positively with explant and outgrowth size.

conclusionsSmall forniceal conjunctival explants grow the most effectively; however, for transplantation purposes, the loss of p63+ and PCNA+ cells with small explants must be considered.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiopsyCell Culture TechniquesCell ProliferationConjunctivaEpithelial CellsImmunohistochemistryMaleRatsRats, Sprague-Dawley

Identifiers

PMID22491407
PMCPMC3367473
OpenAlexW2002105040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.