Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22491353›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2012

Dopamine-related deficit in reward learning after catecholamine depletion in unmedicated, remitted subjects with bulimia nervosa.

Simona Grob, Diego A Pizzagalli, Sunny J Dutra, Jair Stern, Hanspeter Mörgeli, Gabriella Milos, Ulrich Schnyder, Gregor Hasler

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A literature review of dopamine in binge eating.Journal of eating disorders · 2022
    Review
  9. Probabilistic Reinforcement Learning and Anhedonia.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Anhedonia in Eating Disorders.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Neural Correlates of Impaired Reward-Effort Integration in Remitted Bulimia Nervosa.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Microglia disrupt mesolimbic reward circuitry in chronic pain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  18. The role of BDNF, leptin, and catecholamines in reward learning in bulimia nervosa.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Simona GrobDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. simona.grob@bluewin.ch
Diego A Pizzagalli
Sunny J Dutra
Jair Stern
Hanspeter Mörgeli
Gabriella Milos
Ulrich Schnyder
Gregor Hasler
University Hospital of Zurich · CHHarvard University · USUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Zurich · CHYale University · US

Funding

Neuroimaging Studies of Reward Processing in DepressionR01MH068376 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI PIZZAGALLI, DIEGO A · 2004 to 2014
$4.5M
Translational Measures of anhedonia in humans and ratsR21MH078979 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI PIZZAGALLI, DIEGO A · 2008 to 2009
$430k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH068376NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH68376NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH078979
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disturbances in reward processing have been implicated in bulimia nervosa (BN). Abnormalities in processing reward-related stimuli might be linked to dysfunctions of the catecholaminergic neurotransmitter system, but findings have been inconclusive. A powerful way to investigate the relationship between catecholaminergic function and behavior is to examine behavioral changes in response to experimental catecholamine depletion (CD). The purpose of this study was to uncover putative catecholaminergic dysfunction in remitted subjects with BN who performed a reinforcement-learning task after CD. CD was achieved by oral alpha-methyl-para-tyrosine (AMPT) in 19 unmedicated female subjects with remitted BN (rBN) and 28 demographically matched healthy female controls (HC). Sham depletion administered identical capsules containing diphenhydramine. The study design consisted of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover, single-site experimental trial. The main outcome measures were reward learning in a probabilistic reward task analyzed using signal-detection theory. Secondary outcome measures included self-report assessments, including the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire. Relative to healthy controls, rBN subjects were characterized by blunted reward learning in the AMPT--but not in placebo--condition. Highlighting the specificity of these findings, groups did not differ in their ability to perceptually distinguish between stimuli. Increased CD-induced anhedonic (but not eating disorder) symptoms were associated with a reduced response bias toward a more frequently rewarded stimulus. In conclusion, under CD, rBN subjects showed reduced reward learning compared with healthy control subjects. These deficits uncover disturbance of the central reward processing systems in rBN related to altered brain catecholamine levels, which might reflect a trait-like deficit increasing vulnerability to BN.

Indexed as

RewardAdultalpha-MethyltyrosineBulimia NervosaCatecholaminesConditioning, OperantDiscrimination, PsychologicalDopamineDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansProlactinPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychomotor PerformanceReaction Timealpha-MethyltyrosineCatecholaminesDopamineProlactin

Identifiers

PMID22491353
PMCPMC3376326
OpenAlexW2096006129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.