Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22490548›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2013

DICCCOL: dense individualized and common connectivity-based cortical landmarks.

Dajiang Zhu, Kaiming Li, Lei Guo, Xi Jiang, Tuo Zhang, Degang Zhang, Hanbo Chen, Fan Deng, Carlos Faraco, Changfeng Jin and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. A Unified Continuous Staging Framework for Alzheimer's Disease and Lewy Body Dementia via Hierarchical Anatomical Features.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Dajiang ZhuDepartment of Computer Science and Bioimaging Research Center, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Kaiming Li
Lei Guo
Xi Jiang
Tuo Zhang
Degang Zhang
Hanbo Chen
Fan Deng
Carlos Faraco
Changfeng Jin
Chong-Yaw Wee
Yixuan Yuan
Peili Lv
Yan Yin
Xiaolei Hu
Lian Duan
Xintao Hu
Junwei Han
Lihong Wang
Dinggang Shen
L Stephen Miller
Lingjiang Li
Tianming Liu

Funding

Exercise & Overweight Children's CognitionR01HL087923 · NHLBI · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, CATHERINE LUCY, MCDOWELL, JENNIFER E · 2008 to 2012
$5.2M
Assessing Large-scale Connectivities in Prenatal Cocaine Exposure Affected BrainsR01DA033393 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI HU, XIAOPING P, LIU, TIANMING · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
FMRI: Prediction of Mild Cognitive Impairment In Geriatric DepressionK23AG028982 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, LIHONG · 2008 to 2010
$627k
Computer Aided Diagnosis and Followup of Alzheimer's DiseaseK01EB006878 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI LIU, TIANMING · 2007 to 2010
$477k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL087923-03S2NIA NIH HHS K23 AG028982NIA NIH HHS K23-AG028982NIBIB NIH HHS K01 EB 006878NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Is there a common structural and functional cortical architecture that can be quantitatively encoded and precisely reproduced across individuals and populations? This question is still largely unanswered due to the vast complexity, variability, and nonlinearity of the cerebral cortex. Here, we hypothesize that the common cortical architecture can be effectively represented by group-wise consistent structural fiber connections and take a novel data-driven approach to explore the cortical architecture. We report a dense and consistent map of 358 cortical landmarks, named Dense Individualized and Common Connectivity-based Cortical Landmarks (DICCCOLs). Each DICCCOL is defined by group-wise consistent white-matter fiber connection patterns derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data. Our results have shown that these 358 landmarks are remarkably reproducible over more than one hundred human brains and possess accurate intrinsically established structural and functional cross-subject correspondences validated by large-scale functional magnetic resonance imaging data. In particular, these 358 cortical landmarks can be accurately and efficiently predicted in a new single brain with DTI data. Thus, this set of 358 DICCCOL landmarks comprehensively encodes the common structural and functional cortical architectures, providing opportunities for many applications in brain science including mapping human brain connectomes, as demonstrated in this work.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsAlgorithmsAttentionCerebral CortexDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEmotionsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve Fibers, Myelinated

Identifiers

PMID22490548
PMCPMC3593574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.