Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22489640›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2012

Early steps in the development of a claims-based targeted healthcare safety monitoring system and application to three empirical examples.

Peter M Wahl, Joshua J Gagne, Thomas E Wasser, Debra F Eisenberg, J Keith Rodgers, Gregory W Daniel, Marcus Wilson, Sebastian Schneeweiss, Jeremy A Rassen, Amanda R Patrick and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Peter M WahlDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA. pwahl@partners.org
Joshua J Gagne
Thomas E Wasser
Debra F Eisenberg
J Keith Rodgers
Gregory W Daniel
Marcus Wilson
Sebastian Schneeweiss
Jeremy A Rassen
Amanda R Patrick
Jerry Avorn
Rhonda L Bohn

Funding

"Stopping Rules" for Drug Safety Monitoring Using Healthcare DatabasesRC1LM010351 · NLM · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SCHNEEWEISS, SEBASTIAN G. · 2009 to 2010
$975k
NLM NIH HHS RC1LM010351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral efforts are under way to develop and test methods for prospective drug safety monitoring using large, electronic claims databases. Prospective monitoring systems must incorporate signalling algorithms and techniques to mitigate confounding in order to minimize false positive and false negative signals due to chance and bias.

objectiveThe aim of the study was to describe a prototypical targeted active safety monitoring system and apply the framework to three empirical examples.

methodsWe performed sequential, targeted safety monitoring in three known drug/adverse event (AE) pairs: (i) paroxetine/upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleed; (ii) lisinopril/angioedema; (iii) ciprofloxacin/Achilles tendon rupture (ATR). Data on new users of the drugs of interest were extracted from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database. New users were matched by propensity score to new users of comparator drugs in each example. Analyses were conducted sequentially to emulate prospective monitoring. Two signalling rules--a maximum sequential probability ratio test and an effect estimate-based approach--were applied to sequential, matched cohorts to identify signals within the system.

resultsSignals were identified for all three examples: paroxetine/UGI bleed in the seventh monitoring cycle, within 2 calendar years of sequential data; lisinopril/angioedema in the second cycle, within the first monitoring year; ciprofloxacin/ATR in the tenth cycle, within the fifth year.

conclusionIn this proof of concept, our targeted, active monitoring system provides an alternative to systems currently in the literature. Our system employs a sequential, propensity score-matched framework and signalling rules for prospective drug safety monitoring and identified signals for all three adverse drug reactions evaluated.

Indexed as

Achilles TendonAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAlgorithmsAngioedemaAntihypertensive AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsCiprofloxacinDatabases, FactualDrug MonitoringElectronic Health RecordsGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansLisinoprilParoxetinePilot ProjectsProspective StudiesAntihypertensive AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsCiprofloxacinLisinoprilParoxetineSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.