Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22489176›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2012

Cellulose biosynthesis inhibitors: comparative effect on bean cell cultures.

Penélope García-Angulo, Ana Alonso-Simón, Antonio Encina, Jesús M Álvarez, José L Acebes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Penélope García-AnguloDepartment of Agricultural Engineering and Sciences, Plant Physiology Lab, University of León, E-24071, León, Spain.
Ana Alonso-SimónDepartment of Agricultural Engineering and Sciences, Plant Physiology Lab, University of León, E-24071, León, Spain.
Antonio EncinaDepartment of Agricultural Engineering and Sciences, Plant Physiology Lab, University of León, E-24071, León, Spain.
Jesús M ÁlvarezDepartment of Agricultural Engineering and Sciences, Plant Physiology Lab, University of León, E-24071, León, Spain.
José L AcebesDepartment of Agricultural Engineering and Sciences, Plant Physiology Lab, University of León, E-24071, León, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The variety of bioassays developed to evaluate different inhibition responses for cellulose biosynthesis inhibitors makes it difficult to compare the results obtained. This work aims (i) to test a single inhibitory assay for comparing active concentrations of a set of putative cellulose biosynthesis inhibitors and (ii) to characterize their effect on cell wall polysaccharides biosynthesis following a short-term exposure. For the first aim, dose-response curves for inhibition of dry-weight increase following a 30 days exposure of bean callus-cultured cells to these inhibitors were obtained. The compound concentration capable of inhibiting dry weight increase by 50% compared to control (I(50)) ranged from subnanomolar (CGA 325'615) to nanomolar (AE F150944, flupoxam, triazofenamide and oxaziclomefone) and micromolar (dichlobenil, quinclorac and compound 1) concentrations. In order to gain a better understanding of the effect of the putative inhibitors on cell wall polysaccharides biosynthesis, the [(14)C]glucose incorporation into cell wall fractions was determined after a 20 h exposure of cell suspensions to each inhibitor at their I(50) value. All the inhibitors tested decreased glucose incorporation into cellulose with the exception of quinclorac, which increased it. In some herbicide treatments, reduction in the incorporation into cellulose was accompanied by an increase in the incorporation into other fractions. In order to appreciate the effect of the inhibitors on cell wall partitioning, a cluster and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) based on the relative contribution of [(14)C]glucose incorporation into the different cell wall fractions were performed, and three groups of compounds were identified. The first group included quinclorac, which increased glucose incorporation into cellulose; the second group consisted of compound 1, CGA 325'615, oxaziclomefone and AE F150944, which decreased the relative glucose incorporation into cellulose but increased it into tightly-bound cellulose fractions; and the third group, comprising flupoxam, triazofenamide and dichlobenil, decreased the relative glucose incorporation into cellulose and increased it into a pectin rich fraction.

Indexed as

Biological TransportCarbohydrate MetabolismCells, CulturedCelluloseCell WallGlucoseHerbicidesNitrilesOxazinesPhaseolusPolysaccharidesPrincipal Component AnalysisQuinolinesTriazinesAE F150944CellulosedichlobanilGlucoseHerbicidesNitrilesoxaziclomefoneOxazinesPolysaccharidesquincloracQuinolinesTriazinesAE F150944cell culturescellulose biosynthesis-inhibitor (CBI) herbicidescell wallCGA 325′615compound 1dichlobenilPhaseolus vulgaris L.quincloractriazofenamide

Identifiers

PMID22489176
PMCPMC3317736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.