Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2013
Platelet-rich plasma: does it help reduce tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction?
Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Platelet-rich plasma in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An updated systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2026Pooled it
- Autologous platelet concentrate augmentation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a level I evidence-based meta-analysis.Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of platelet-rich plasma augmentation on postoperative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Pooled it
- The effect of platelet-rich plasma on clinical outcomes within two years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Influence of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) analogues on healing and clinical outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Orthopaedic surgery · 2022Pooled it
- PRP does not improve the objective outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021Pooled it
- Platelet-rich therapies for musculoskeletal soft tissue injuries.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- The effects of platelet-rich plasma therapy on outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Type I Atelocollagen Interposition Within the ACL Graft During ACL Reconstruction: An Exploratory Clinical and MRI-Based Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Role of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Platelet-Rich Plasma in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Poor Adherence to Minimum Information for Studies Evaluating Biologics in Orthopaedics Guidelines: Platelet-Rich Plasma-Augmented ACL Reconstruction.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Review
- Functional and Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Biologic Augmentation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- Review
- Clinical Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma to Promote Tendon-Bone Healing and Graft Maturation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction-A Randomized Controlled Study.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Article
- Effects of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2022Review
- Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part 1: biology and biomechanics.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022Review
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Is Biological Augmentation Beneficial?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in reducing femoral and tibial tunnel enlargement in patients operated on for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings.
methodsForty male patients, in which both femoral and tibial 9-mm tunnels were performed because of the graft size, were enrolled in this prospective study. They were randomly assigned to group A (20 patients, PRP group) and group B (20 patients, control group). All patients were followed up at a median of 14.7 months (range 10-16 months), with a physical examination, the Tegner, Lysholm and objective IKDC scoring scales, and with the KT-1000 arthrometer. Moreover, they underwent a CT evaluation in order to assess the amount of tunnel enlargement.
resultsFemoral tunnel diameter increased from 9.0 ± 0.1 mm to 9.8 ± 0.3 mm in group A (p = 0.032) and from 9.0 ± 0.1 mm to 9.4 ± 0.5 mm in group B (p = 0.043). Tibial tunnel diameter increased from 9.0 ± 0.2 mm to 10.9 ± 0.2 mm in group A (p = 0.029) and from 9.1 ± 0.1 mm to 10.1 ± 0.4 mm in group B (p = 0.028). Physical examination as well as the evaluation scales used showed no differences between the two groups.
conclusionsThe use of PRP does not seem to be effective in preventing tunnel enlargement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22488012What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.