Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22488002›Full record

Trial reportCritical care medicine2012

A double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing soybean oil-based versus olive oil-based lipid emulsions in adult medical-surgical intensive care unit patients requiring parenteral nutrition.

Guillermo E Umpierrez, Ronnie Spiegelman, Vivian Zhao, Dawn D Smiley, Ingrid Pinzon, Daniel P Griffith, Limin Peng, Timothy Morris, Menghua Luo, Hermes Garcia and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00672854 (Study Comparing a Soybean Oil-Based vs Olive Oil-Based Lipid Emulsion), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00672854 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Study Comparing a Soybean Oil-Based vs Olive Oil-Based Lipid Emulsion: Effects on Endothelial Function, Inflammatory Markers, Oxidative Stress, Immune Function,Insulin Sensitivity and Carb Metabolism Intensive Care Unit Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorEmory UniversityRan2008 to 2010Enrolled100ConditionsParenteral NutritionArmsClinOleic 20% Intravenous Emulsion, Intralipid, 20% Intravenous Emulsion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Distal Bowel Re-feeding in Patients with Proximal Jejunostomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Intravenous Fat Emulsion Formulations for the Adult and Pediatric Patient: Understanding the Differences.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guillermo E UmpierrezDepartment of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. geumpie@emory.edu
Ronnie Spiegelman
Vivian Zhao
Dawn D Smiley
Ingrid Pinzon
Daniel P Griffith
Limin Peng
Timothy Morris
Menghua Luo
Hermes Garcia
Christopher Thomas
Christopher A Newton
Thomas R Ziegler
Emory University · US

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR025008 · NCRR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2007 to 2011
$29.0M
Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalUL1TR000454 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$25.8M
Patient Oriented Research in Clinical NutritionK24RR023356 · NCRR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ZIEGLER, THOMAS R · 2007 to 2011
$839k
KPDM: Predictive Markers, Underlying Mechanisms, and Treatment OutcomesK08DK083036 · NIDDK · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SMILEY, DAWN DIESE · 2009 to 2012
$594k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000454NCRR NIH HHS K24 RR023356NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025008NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK083036NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK0830361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveParenteral nutrition has been associated with metabolic and infectious complications in intensive care unit patients. The underlying mechanism for the high risk of complications is not known but may relate to the proinflammatory effects of soybean oil-based lipid emulsions, the only Food and Drug Administration-approved lipid formulation for clinical use.

designProspective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

settingMedical-surgical intensive care units from a major urban teaching hospital and a tertiary referral university hospital. PATIENTS: Adult medical-surgical intensive care unit patients.

interventionParenteral nutrition containing soybean oil-based (Intralipid) or olive oil-based (ClinOleic) lipid emulsions. MEASUREMENTS: Differences in hospital clinical outcomes (nosocomial infections and noninfectious complications), hospital length of stay, glycemic control, inflammatory and oxidative stress markers, and granulocyte and monocyte functions between study groups.

resultsA total of 100 patients were randomized to either soybean oil-based parenteral nutrition or olive oil-based parenteral nutrition for up to 28 days. A total of 49 patients received soybean oil-based parenteral nutrition (age 51 ± 15 yrs, body mass index 27 ± 6 kg/m2, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 15.5 ± 7 [±SD]), and a total of 51 patients received olive oil-based lipid emulsion in parenteral nutrition (age 46 ± 19 yrs, body mass index 27 ± 8 kg/m2, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 15.1 ± 6 [±SD]) for a mean duration of 12.9 ± 8 days. The mean hospital blood glucose concentration during parenteral nutrition was 129 ± 14 mg/dL, without differences between groups. Patients treated with soybean oil-based and olive oil-based parenteral nutrition had a similar length of stay (47 ± 47 days and 41 ± 36 days, p = .49), mortality (16.3% and 9.8%, p = .38), nosocomial infections (43% vs. 57%, p = .16), and acute renal failure (26% vs. 18%, p = .34). In addition, there were no differences in inflammatory and oxidative stress markers or in granulocyte and monocyte functions between groups.

conclusionThe administration of parenteral nutrition containing soybean oil-based and olive oil-based lipid emulsion resulted in similar rates of infectious and noninfectious complications and no differences in glycemic control, inflammatory and oxidative stress markers, and immune function in critically ill adults.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCritical CareDouble-Blind MethodFat Emulsions, IntravenousFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedOlive OilParenteral NutritionPlant OilsProspective StudiesSoybean OilSurgical Procedures, OperativeFat Emulsions, IntravenousOlive OilPlant OilsSoybean Oil

Identifiers

PMID22488002
PMCPMC3738173
OpenAlexW1964792635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.