ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2012
Why HURT? A review of clinical instruments for headache management.
Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations between good days per month and migraine-related disease impact in the real-world: a post hoc analysis from the REVIEW study of eptinezumab in chronic migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Observational
- Article
- The impacts of migraine on functioning: Results from two qualitative studies of people living with migraine.Headache · 2024Article
- Individual endogenous pain modulation profiles within a multidimensional context of people with cervicogenic headache - A retrospective exploratory study.Musculoskeletal science & practice · 2023Article
- The Global Campaign turns 18: a brief review of its activities and achievements.The journal of headache and pain · 2022Review
- Exploring multidimensional characteristics in cervicogenic headache: Relations between pain processing, lifestyle, and psychosocial factors.Brain and behavior · 2021Article
- Spinal postural variability relates to biopsychosocial variables in patients with cervicogenic headache.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Importance of quantifying migraine disability in the native language of the migraineur.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2020Article
- Thai-version Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire: concurrent validity, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and factors predictive for migraine-related disability.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2020Article
- Sex and Gender Differences in Migraine-Evaluating Knowledge Gaps.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2018Article
- Acceptance, Psychiatric Symptoms, and Migraine Disability: An Observational Study in a Headache Center.Headache · 2018Observational
- Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the German version of the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2018Article
- The headache under-response to treatment (HURT) questionnaire, an outcome measure to guide follow-up in primary care: development, psychometric evaluation and assessment of utility.The journal of headache and pain · 2018Article
- Quality indicators in headache care: an implementation study in six Italian specialist-care centres.The journal of headache and pain · 2017Article
- Development and exploration of the content validity of a patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate the impact of migraine- the migraine physical function impact diary (MPFID).Health and quality of life outcomes · 2017Article
- Headache service quality: evaluation of quality indicators in 14 specialist-care centres.The journal of headache and pain · 2016Article
- Measuring the impact of migraine for evaluating outcomes of preventive treatments for migraine headaches.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2016Article
- The psychometric properties of the Comprehensive Headache-related Quality of life Questionnaire (CHQQ) translated to Serbian.SpringerPlus · 2016Article
- Structured education can improve primary-care management of headache: the first empirical evidence, from a controlled interventional study.The journal of headache and pain · 2016Article
- Evaluation of headache service quality indicators: pilot implementation in two specialist-care centres.The journal of headache and pain · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Global Campaign against Headache, directed by the non-governmental organization Lifting The Burden (LTB) in official relations with the World Health Organization (WHO), aspires to reduce the global burden of headache. Ultimately this calls for improvements in headache management, largely in primary care, where most people with headache receive medical care. In support, LTB is developing a range of headache management aids for primary care. Presently, no single instrument covers the range of assessment and decision-making necessary for successful headache management, and few make the important link between assessment and clinical advice. Expressly to fill this gap, LTB has developed a new instrument: the Headache Under-Response to Treatment (HURT) Questionnaire, an eight-item, self-administered questionnaire addressing headache frequency, disability, medication use and effect, perceptions of headache "control" and knowledge of diagnosis. This instrument is intended not only to evaluate current headache outcomes and assess the need for and response to treatment, but also to provide guidance on appropriate actions towards treatment optimization. The first draft of the HURT was created by an expert consensus group, meeting at WHO headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland. The final version came about through multiple refinements following psychometric testing. Assessment of clinical utility is ongoing in multiple countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22487847What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.