Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22487374›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2012

Enhancers as information integration hubs in development: lessons from genomics.

Christa Buecker, Joanna Wysocka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 178 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
178citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

178 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Enhancer hubs govern chromatin topology and Th17 cell identity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

118 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christa BueckerDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Joanna Wysocka

Funding

Chromatin remodeling in multipotent neural crest formation and CHARGE syndromeR01GM095555 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WYSOCKA, JOANNA · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM095555NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptional enhancers are the primary determinants of tissue-specific gene expression. Although the majority of our current knowledge of enhancer elements comes from detailed analyses of individual loci, recent progress in epigenomics has led to the development of methods for comprehensive and conservation-independent annotation of cell type-specific enhancers. Here, we discuss the advantages and limitations of different genomic approaches to enhancer mapping and summarize observations that have been afforded by the genome-wide views of enhancer landscapes, with a focus on development. We propose that enhancers serve as information integration hubs, at which instructions encoded by the genome are read in the context of a specific cellular state, signaling milieu and chromatin environment, allowing for exquisitely precise spatiotemporal control of gene expression during embryogenesis.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticGenomicsAnimalsGene Expression RegulationHumansModels, GeneticOrgan Specificity

Identifiers

PMID22487374
PMCPMC5064438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.