Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22486174›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2012

Alcohol exposure rate control through physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling.

Martin H Plawecki, Ulrich S Zimmermann, Victor Vitvitskiy, Peter C Doerschuk, David Crabb, Sean O'Connor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sensation seeking, impulsivity, and aggression moderate sex effects on adolescent laboratory binging.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The OPRM1 A118G polymorphism: converging evidence against associations with alcohol sensitivity and consumption.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martin H PlaweckiDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Ulrich S Zimmermann
Victor Vitvitskiy
Peter C Doerschuk
David Crabb
Sean O'Connor

Funding

Translational Research and Science Education (OUT)P60AA007611 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI Marian Lee Logrip · 2003 to 2026
$45.5M
INDIANA CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE (UL1): BPCAUL1RR025761 · NCRR · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2008 to 2011
$21.0M
SELECTION FOR ALCOHOL PREFERENCE AND PHENOTYPINGR01AA010722 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI STEWART, ROBERT BRUCE · 1995 to 2004
$2.5M
NCRR NIH HHS MO1 RR750NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025761NCRR NIH HHS UL RR025761NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA007611NIAAA NIH HHS P60AA007611NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA010722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe instantaneous rate of change of alcohol exposure (slope) may contribute to changes in measures of brain function following administration of alcohol that are usually attributed to breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) acting alone. To test this proposition, a 2-session experiment was designed in which carefully prescribed, constant-slope trajectories of BrAC intersected at the same exposure level and time since the exposure began. This paper presents the methods and limitations of the experimental design.

methodsIndividualized intravenous infusion rate profiles of 6% ethanol (EtOH) that achieved the constant-slope trajectories for an individual were precomputed using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model. Adjusting the parameters of the model allowed each infusion profile to account for the subject's EtOH distribution and elimination kinetics. Sessions were conducted in randomized order and made no use of feedback of BrAC measurements obtained during the session to modify the precalculated infusion profiles. In one session, an individual's time course of exposure, BrAC(t), was prescribed to rise at a constant rate of 6.0 mg% per minute until it reached 68 mg% and then descend at -1.0 mg% per minute; in the other, to rise at a rate of 3.0 mg% per minute. The 2 exposure trajectories were designed to intersect at a BrAC (t = 20 minutes) = 60 mg% at an experimental time of 20 minutes.

resultsIntersection points for 54 of 61 subjects were within prescribed deviations (range of ± 3 mg% and ± 4 minutes from the nominal intersection point).

conclusionsResults confirmed the feasibility of applying the novel methods for achieving the intended time courses of the BrAC, with technical problems limiting success to 90% of the individuals tested.

Indexed as

AdultBrainBreath TestsCentral Nervous System DepressantsEthanolFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleModels, TheoreticalTime FactorsCentral Nervous System DepressantsEthanol

Identifiers

PMID22486174
PMCPMC3370150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.