ReviewTherapeutic delivery2012
Physically facilitating drug-delivery systems.
Review in Therapeutic delivery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transdermal needle-free drug delivery approaches and activation mechanism.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Magnetic and/or Radiopaque Functionalization of Self-Unfolding Foils for Improved Applicability within Oral Drug Delivery.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2023Article
- Using RNA-based therapies to target the kidney in cardiovascular disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Electrochemotherapy: An Alternative Strategy for Improving Therapy in Drug-Resistant SOLID Tumors.Cancers · 2022Review
- Foundations of gastrointestinal-based drug delivery and future developments.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022Review
- Delivery of siRNA to ovarian cancer cells using laser-activated carbon nanoparticles.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2015Article
- Characterization of a setup to test the impact of high-amplitude pressure waves on living cells.Scientific reports · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Facilitated/modulated drug-delivery systems have emerged as a possible solution for delivery of drugs of interest to pre-allocated sites at predetermined doses for predefined periods of time. Over the past decade, the use of different physical methods and mechanisms to mediate drug release and delivery has grown significantly. This emerging area of research has important implications for development of new therapeutic drugs for efficient treatments. This review aims to introduce and describe different modalities of physically facilitating drug-delivery systems that are currently in use for cancer and other diseases therapy. In particular, delivery methods based on ultrasound, electrical, magnetic and photo modulations are highlighted. Current uses and areas of improvement for these different physically facilitating drug-delivery systems are discussed. Furthermore, the main advantages and drawbacks of these technologies reviewed are compared. The review ends with a speculative viewpoint of how research is expected to evolve in the upcoming years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.