Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22485136›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Skin regeneration in adult axolotls: a blueprint for scar-free healing in vertebrates.

Ashley W Seifert, James R Monaghan, S Randal Voss, Malcolm Maden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed
17.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 250 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Macrophages orchestrate tail regeneration in lizardsFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  7. RestoringFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley W SeifertDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America. seifert@ufl.edu
James R Monaghan
S Randal Voss
Malcolm Maden
University of Florida · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

Research Resources for Model AmphibiansR24OD010435 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI SMITH, JERAMIAH JAMES, VOSS, STEPHEN RANDAL · 2012 to 2025
$5.7M
GENOME RESOURCES FOR MODEL AMPHIBIANSR24RR016344 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI VOSS, STEPHEN RANDAL · 2002 to 2011
$3.5M
DISSECTING THE EAR NEUROSENSORY DEVELOPMENT.R01DC005590 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI FRITZSCH, BERND · 2002 to 2010
$3.3M
Training Program in Regenerative MedicineT32DK074367 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SCOTT, EDWARD W · 2007 to 2022
$2.9M
Validation of a Novel Genetic Model for Neural RegenerationRC2NS069480 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SCOTT, EDWARD W · 2009 to 2010
$2.1M
NCRR NIH HHS R24 RR016344NCRR NIH HHS R24-RR016344NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005590NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC005590-07S1NIDDK NIH HHS 5T32DK074367NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK074367NIH HHS R24 OD010435NINDS NIH HHS 5RC2NS069480NINDS NIH HHS RC2 NS069480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While considerable progress has been made towards understanding the complex processes and pathways that regulate human wound healing, regenerative medicine has been unable to develop therapies that coax the natural wound environment to heal scar-free. The inability to induce perfect skin regeneration stems partly from our limited understanding of how scar-free healing occurs in a natural setting. Here we have investigated the wound repair process in adult axolotls and demonstrate that they are capable of perfectly repairing full thickness excisional wounds made on the flank. In the context of mammalian wound repair, our findings reveal a substantial reduction in hemostasis, reduced neutrophil infiltration and a relatively long delay in production of new extracellular matrix (ECM) during scar-free healing. Additionally, we test the hypothesis that metamorphosis leads to scarring and instead show that terrestrial axolotls also heal scar-free, albeit at a slower rate. Analysis of newly forming dermal ECM suggests that low levels of fibronectin and high levels of tenascin-C promote regeneration in lieu of scarring. Lastly, a genetic analysis during wound healing comparing epidermis between aquatic and terrestrial axolotls suggests that matrix metalloproteinases may regulate the fibrotic response. Our findings outline a blueprint to understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms coordinating scar-free healing that will be useful towards elucidating new regenerative therapies targeting fibrosis and wound repair.

Indexed as

RegenerationAmbystoma mexicanumAmphibian ProteinsAnimalsBasement MembraneCicatrixExtracellular MatrixFibrillar CollagensHemostasisInflammationKeratinocytesLeukocytesMatrix MetalloproteinasesMetamorphosis, BiologicalNeutrophil InfiltrationSkinAmphibian ProteinsFibrillar CollagensMatrix MetalloproteinasesTenascin

Identifiers

PMID22485136
PMCPMC3317654
OpenAlexW1988279940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.