ArticleClinical neuroradiology2012
Visual assessment of magnetic resonance imaging perfusion lesions in a large patient group.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of Skull Base Lesions Using Pseudo-Continuous Arterial Spin Labeling.Clinical neuroradiology · 2019Article
- Effects of salvianolic acid on cerebral perfusion in patients after acute stroke: A single-center randomized controlled trial.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2018Article
- Spatial distribution of perfusion abnormality in acute MCA occlusion is associated with likelihood of later recanalization.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2014Article
- Therapeutic imaging window of cerebral infarction revealed by multisequence magnetic resonance imaging: An animal and clinical study.Neural regeneration research · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFew magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of stroke have evaluated the value of visual assessment of perfusion/diffusion mismatch, which is crucial for routine application. In this study an attempt was made to visually assess perfusion lesions resembling the acute clinical situation and identify parameters with the highest interobserver reliability when used to define a perfusion/diffusion mismatch and the highest accuracy for prediction of infarct growth.
methodsMagnetic resonance imaging was performed within 6 h of symptom onset and again 1-11 days thereafter in 86 consecutive stroke patients who received intravenous thrombolytic therapy. The MRI protocol included diffusion-weighted imaging apparent diffusion coefficient (DWI/ADC), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and perfusion imaging (PI). Maps for different perfusion parameters, e.g. cerebral blood volume (CBV), cerebral blood flow (CBF), mean transit time (MTT) and time to peak (TTP) were calculated. Areas of perfusion deficits of all perfusion parameters were visually compared to corresponding ADCs and final infarct size by two independent observers.
resultsThe final infarct size was overestimated by TTP (in 81/83 patients by raters 1 and 2, respectively), MTT (82/83) and CBF (65/74) lesions. The ADC lesions were rated smaller than the final infarct size in 43/38 cases by raters 1 and 2 and the CBV decrease was rated to underestimate final infarct size in 40/31 cases. The only significantly increased OR of 3.883 (95 % CI 1.466-10.819, p = 0.004, rater 1)/5.142 (95 % CI 1.828-15.142, p = 0.001, rater 2) for predicting infarct growth was observed for the presence of a CBV > ADC mismatch, which also showed the highest kappa value of 0.407.
conclusionsAll mismatch patterns were prone to high interrater variability when assessed under conditions resembling the clinical setting. Of all tested mismatch patterns the CBV > ADC mismatch was the strongest predictor of lesion growth while visual assessment of TTP and CBF generally resulted in an overestimation of infarct sizes and the presence of a TTP > ADC or CBF > ADC mismatch was not significantly predictive for lesion growth. Visual inspection of these most commonly used mismatch patterns has a low value for the prediction of infarct growth and thus the estimation of the penumbra in ischemic stroke patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22484907What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.