Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22484800›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2012

Quality of life over time in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ, early-stage invasive breast cancer, and age-matched controls.

D B Jeffe, M Pérez, Y Liu, K K Collins, R L Aft, M Schootman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Quality of life issues in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Higher-intensity exercise helps cancer survivors remain motivated.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2016
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Quality of life among women with symptomatic, screen-detected, and interval breast cancer, and for women without breast cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional study from Norway.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Psychological morbidity in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ compared with women with early breast cancer receiving radiotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D B JeffeDivision of Health Behavior Research, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, 4444 Forest Park, Suite 6700, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA. djeffe@dom.wustl.edu
M Pérez
Y Liu
K K Collins
R L Aft
M Schootman

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AIMEE S JAMES · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
Quality of Life Over Time: DCIS vs Early Breast CancerR01CA102777 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JEFFE, DONNA B · 2003 to 2007
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCI NIH HHS R01 CA102777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about quality-of-life (QOL) differences over time between incident ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and early-stage invasive breast cancer (EIBC) cases as compared with same-aged women without breast cancer (controls). We prospectively recruited and interviewed 1,096 women [16.8% DCIS, 33.3% EIBC (25.7% Stage I; and 7.6% Stage IIA), 49.9% controls; mean age 58; 23.7% non-white] at mean 6.7 weeks (T1), and 6.2 (T2), 12.3 (T3), and 24.4 months (T4) after surgery (patients) or screening mammogram (controls). We tested two hypotheses: (1) DCIS patients would report lower levels of QOL compared with controls but would report similar QOL compared with EIBC patients at baseline; and (2) DCIS patients' QOL would improve during 2-year follow-up and approach levels similar to that of controls faster than EIBC patients. We tested hypothesis 1 using separate general linear regression models for each of the eight subscales on the RAND 36-item Health Survey, controlling for variables associated with at least one subscale at T1. Both DCIS and EIBC patients reported lower QOL at T1 than controls on all subscales (each P<0.05). We tested hypothesis 2 using generalized estimating equations to examine change in each QOL subscale over time across the three diagnostic groups adjusting for covariates. By T3, physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, energy/fatigue, and general health each differed significantly by diagnostic group at P<0.05, because of larger differences between EIBC patients and controls; but DCIS patients no longer differed significantly from controls on any of the QOL subscales. At T4, EIBC patients still reported worse physical functioning (P=0.0001) and general health (P=0.0017) than controls, possibly because of lingering treatment effects. DCIS patients' QOL was similar to that of controls two years after diagnosis, but some aspects of EIBC patients' QOL remained lower.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCase-Control StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID22484800
PMCPMC3448489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.