Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22484724›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2012

Initial report of quantification of retinal blood flow velocity in normal human subjects using the Retinal Functional Imager (RFI).

Gennady Landa, Anisha A Jangi, Patricia M T Garcia, Richard B Rosen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Assessment of potential vessel segmentation pitfalls in the analysis of blood flow velocity using the Retinal Function Imager.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The association between the foveal avascular zone and retinal thickness.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2014
    Article
  18. Segmental reproducibility of retinal blood flow velocity measurements using retinal function imager.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2013
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gennady LandaRetina Center, Department of Ophthalmology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Anisha A Jangi
Patricia M T Garcia
Richard B Rosen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Retinal Functional Imager (RFI) is a novel method for assessing retinal blood flow (RBF) velocity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate RBF velocities in normal human retinas using the RFI. RBF velocity measurements were performed in normal subjects using the RFI (Optical Imaging Ltd., Rehovot, Israel) at the Retina Center of The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, USA. Using proprietary software processing, the characteristics of the RBF were visualized and measured. The study population comprised fifty-four eyes of 27 normal subjects (20 male and 34 female). The average arterial blood flow velocity was 4.6 ± 0.6 mm/s in males and 4.8 ± 0.7 mm/s in females (the difference was not statistically significant, p value = 0.27). The average venous blood flow velocity was 3.8 ± 0.5 mm/s in males and 3.6 ± 0.4 mm/s in females (the difference again was not statistically significant, p value = 0.11). The average arterial blood flow velocity was 4.8 ± 0.5 mm/s in the right eye and 4.6 ± 0.7 mm/s in the left eye. The average venous blood flow velocity was 3.7 ± 0.4 mm/s in the right eye and 3.6 ± 0.3 mm/s in the left eye. Venous and arterial blood flow velocities were found to be faster in the right eye than in the left eye in our sample, but the differences were not statistically significant (p value = 0.53 and 0.33, respectively). This is the first report of quantification of the RBF using the RFI. The RFI appears to be an effective tool in quantitative evaluations of RBF velocities. The values from the study constitute a normative database which can be used to evaluate and compare eyes with known or suspected pathology.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalAdultAgedBlood CirculationBlood Flow VelocityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotographyReference ValuesRegional Blood FlowRetinal ArteryRetinal VeinYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.