Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22484625›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2012

ADME of biologics-what have we learned from small molecules?

Thomayant Prueksaritanont, Cuyue Tang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomayant PrueksaritanontDepartment of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Metabolism, Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp., West Point, Pennsylvania 19486, USA. thomayant_prueksaritanont@merck.com
Cuyue Tang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thorough characterization and in-depth understanding of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (ADME) properties of a drug candidate have been well recognized as an important element in small molecule (SM) drug discovery and development. This has been the area of focus for drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics (DMPK) scientists, whose role has been evolving over the past few decades from primarily being involved in the development space after a preclinical candidate was selected to extending their involvement into the discovery stage prior to candidate selection. This paradigm shift has ensured the entry into development of the best candidates with optimal ADME properties, and thus has greatly impacted SM drug development through significant reduction of the failure rate for pharmacokinetics related reasons. In contrast, the sciences of ADME and DMPK have not been fully integrated into the discovery and development processes for large molecule (LM) drugs. In this mini-review, we reflect on the journey of DMPK support of SM drug discovery and development and highlight the key enablers that have allowed DMPK scientists to make such impacts, with the aim to provide a perspective on relevant lessons learned from SM drugs that are applicable to DMPK support strategies for LMs.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsDrug DiscoveryBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID22484625
PMCPMC3385832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.