Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22484563›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2012

Taste neophobia and palatability: the pleasure of drinking.

Jian-You Lin, Leslie Renee Amodeo, Joseph Arthurs, Steve Reilly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. How Can We Assess Positive Welfare in Ruminants?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jian-You LinDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA. jlin2@uic.edu
Leslie Renee Amodeo
Joseph Arthurs
Steve Reilly

Funding

Parabrachial-Forebrain Interactions in CTAR01DC006456 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI REILLY, STEPHEN · 2004 to 2020
$3.9M
Parabrachial-Forebrain Interactions in Conditioned Taste AversionR56DC006456 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI REILLY, STEPHEN · 2009 to 2009
$339k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC06456NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006456NIDCD NIH HHS R56 DC006456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taste neophobia is manifested behaviorally as lower intake of a novel, potentially dangerous tastant relative to the same tastant when it is perceived as safe and familiar. To further characterize this phenomenon, microstructural analysis of lick patterns was used to track the transition from novel to familiar for three tastants: saccharin, quinine and Polycose. The results revealed that in addition to an increase in the amount consumed (for saccharin and quinine but not Polycose), cluster size (an index of palatability) became larger as familiarity with the benign tastants increased. The current finding suggests that the pleasure of drinking increases as the novel, potentially dangerous tastant becomes accepted as safe.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsData Interpretation, StatisticalDrinking BehaviorFearGlucansMaleQuinineRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySaccharinSweetening AgentsTasteGlucansQuinineSaccharinSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID22484563
PMCPMC3348963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.