Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22484516›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology2012

Sensation seeking predicts brain responses in the old-new task: converging multimodal neuroimaging evidence.

Adam L Lawson, Xun Liu, Jane Joseph, Victoria L Vagnini, Thomas H Kelly, Yang Jiang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neural Mechanisms of Subliminal Mentor-Student Relationship Stimuli Processing: An ERP Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adam L LawsonDepartment of Psychology, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY, USA.
Xun Liu
Jane Joseph
Victoria L Vagnini
Thomas H Kelly
Yang Jiang

Funding

Training and Pilot CoreP50DA005312 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BARDO, MICHAEL T · 1987 to 2016
$19.5M
Neuroimaging of Complex Motion in Young and Old AdultsK01AG000986 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI JIANG, YANG · 2001 to 2005
$584k
NIA NIH HHS AG00986NIA NIH HHS K01 AG000986NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA005312NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA 05312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel images and message content enhance visual attention and memory for high sensation seekers, but the neural mechanisms associated with this effect are unclear. To investigate the individual differences in brain responses to new and old (studied) visual stimuli, we utilized event-related potentials (ERP) and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) measures to examine brain reactivity among high and low sensation seekers during a classic old-new memory recognition task. Twenty low and 20 high sensation seekers completed separate, but parallel, ERP and fMRI sessions. For each session, participants initially studied drawings of common images, and then performed an old-new recognition task during scanning. High sensation seekers showed greater ERP responses to new objects at the frontal N2 ERP component, compared to low sensation seekers. The ERP Novelty-N2 responses were correlated with fMRI responses in the orbitofrontal gyrus. Sensation seeking status also modulated the FN400 ERP component indexing familiarity and conceptual learning, along with fMRI responses in the caudate nucleus, which correlated with FN400 activity. No group differences were found in the late ERP positive components indexing classic old-new amplitude effects. Our combined ERP and fMRI results suggest that sensation-seeking personality affects the early brain responses to visual processing, but not the later stage of memory recognition.

Indexed as

NeuroimagingAdolescentAdultBrainExploratory BehaviorFemaleForecastingHumansMalePhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeSensationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22484516
PMCPMC3367102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.