Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22483739›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2012

Assessment of MRI parameters as imaging biomarkers for radiation necrosis in the rat brain.

Silun Wang, Erik Tryggestad, Tingting Zhou, Michael Armour, Zhibo Wen, De-Xue Fu, Eric Ford, Peter C M van Zijl, Jinyuan Zhou

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Preclinical MRI: Studies of the irradiated brain.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2018
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Particle Radiation Induced Neurotoxicity in the Central Nervous System.International journal of particle therapy · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Silun WangDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Erik Tryggestad
Tingting Zhou
Michael Armour
Zhibo Wen
De-Xue Fu
Eric Ford
Peter C M van Zijl
Jinyuan Zhou

Funding

X-LINKED ADRENOLEUKODYSTROPHYP41RR015241 · NCRR · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI MC DONALD, JOHN · 2001 to 2011
$18.5M
TR&D 4: Algorithms for functional and anatomical brain analysisP41EB015909 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI MORI, SUSUMU · 2012 to 2020
$13.1M
Novel Approaches for CEST Labeling, Detection, Quantification and TranslationR01EB015032 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM · 2011 to 2019
$3.9M
Amide Proton Transfer (APT) MRI of Brain Tumors at 3T and 7TR01EB009731 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ZHOU, JINYUAN · 2009 to 2016
$2.9M
High-resolution DT-MRI for differentiation of malignant glioma from radiation necR21EB009112 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ZHOU, JINYUAN · 2009 to 2010
$449k
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR015241NCRR NIH HHS RR015241NIBIB NIH HHS EB009112NIBIB NIH HHS EB009731NIBIB NIH HHS EB015032NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015909NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009731NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB015032NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB009112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRadiation necrosis is a major complication of radiation therapy. We explore the features of radiation-induced brain necrosis in the rat, using multiple MRI approaches, including T(1), T(2), apparent diffusion constant (ADC), cerebral blood flow (CBF), magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), and amide proton transfer (APT) of endogenous mobile proteins and peptides. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Adult rats (Fischer 344; n = 15) were irradiated with a single, well-collimated X-ray beam (40 Gy; 10 × 10 mm(2)) in the left brain hemisphere. MRI was acquired on a 4.7-T animal scanner at ~25 weeks' postradiation. The MRI signals of necrotic cores and perinecrotic regions were assessed with a one-way analysis of variance. Histological evaluation was accomplished with hematoxylin and eosin staining.

resultsADC and CBF MRI could separate perinecrotic and contralateral normal brain tissue (p < 0.01 and < 0.05, respectively), whereas T(1), T(2), MTR, and APT could not. MRI signal intensities were significantly lower in the necrotic core than in normal brain for CBF (p < 0.001) and APT (p < 0.01) and insignificantly higher or lower for T(1), T(2), MTR, and ADC. Histological results demonstrated coagulative necrosis within the necrotic core and reactive astrogliosis and vascular damage within the perinecrotic region.

conclusionADC and CBF are promising imaging biomarkers for identifying perinecrotic regions, whereas CBF and APT are promising for identifying necrotic cores.

Indexed as

AmidesAnimalsBody WaterBrainCerebrovascular CirculationContrast MediaDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingGadoliniumMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNecrosisProtonsRadiation Injuries, ExperimentalRatsRats, Inbred F344AmidesContrast MediaGadoliniumProtons

Identifiers

PMID22483739
PMCPMC3361588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.