Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22483672›Full record

ArticlePatient education and counseling2012

Negotiating complementary and alternative medicine use in primary care visits with older patients.

Christopher J Koenig, Evelyn Y Ho, Vivien Yadegar, Derjung M Tarn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient education and counseling, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Oncologists' experiences of discussing complementary and alternative treatment options with their cancer patients. A qualitative analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Physician-patient communication about dietary supplements.Patient education and counseling · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher J KoenigDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94121, USA. christopher.koenig@ucsf.edu
Evelyn Y Ho
Vivien Yadegar
Derjung M Tarn

Funding

UCLA OLDER AMERICANS INDEPENDENCE CENTERP30AG028748 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KARLAMANGLA, ARUN S · 2006 to 2017
$9.8M
MENTORED CLINICAL SCIENTIST DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMK12AG001004 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI REUBEN, DAVID B. · 2000 to 2009
$4.3M
NIA NIH HHS 5K12AG001004NIA NIH HHS K12 AG001004NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028748NIA NIH HHS P30-AG028748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo empirically investigate the ways in which patients and providers discuss Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) treatment in primary care visits.

methodsAudio recordings from visits between 256 adult patients aged 50 years and older and 28 primary care physicians were transcribed and analyzed using discourse analysis, an empirical sociolinguistic methodology focusing on how language is used to negotiate meaning.

resultsDiscussion about CAM occurred 128 times in 82 of 256 visits (32.0%). The most frequently discussed CAM modalities were non-vitamin, non-mineral supplements and massage. Three physician-patient interactions were analyzed turn-by-turn to demonstrate negotiations about CAM use. Patients raised CAM discussions to seek physician expertise about treatments, and physicians adopted a range of responses along a continuum that included encouragement, neutrality, and discouragement. Despite differential knowledge about CAM treatments, physicians helped patients assess the risks and benefits of CAM treatments and made recommendations based on patient preferences for treatment.

conclusionRegardless of a physician's stance or knowledge about CAM, she or he can help patients negotiate CAM treatment decisions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Providers do not have to possess extensive knowledge about specific CAM treatments to have meaningful discussions with patients and to give patients a framework for evaluating CAM treatment use.

Indexed as

CommunicationNegotiatingPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelComplementary TherapiesCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedOffice Visits

Identifiers

PMID22483672
PMCPMC3630233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.