Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22482820›Full record

ReviewThe Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice2012

Viral reproductive pathogens of dogs and cats.

Nicola Decaro, Leland E Carmichael, Canio Buonavoglia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Infertility In Queens: Clinical approach, experiences and challenges.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Sepsis in cougar (Puma concolor) associated with Chromobacterium violaceum.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicola DecaroDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of Bari, Strada per Casamassima Km 3, 70010 Valenzano, Bari, Italy.
Leland E Carmichael
Canio Buonavoglia

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reviews the current literature on the viral agents that cause reproductive failures in domestic carnivores (dogs and cats). A meaningful update is provided on the etiologic, clinical, pathologic, diagnostic, and prophylactic aspects of the viral infections impacting canine and feline reproduction as a consequence of either direct virus replication or severe debilitation of pregnant animals.

Indexed as

Abortion, VeterinaryAnimalsAntiviral AgentsCat DiseasesCatsDog DiseasesDogsFemaleMalePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousVirus DiseasesAntiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID22482820
PMCPMC7114855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.