Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22482468›Full record

ReviewThe ocular surface2012

Corneal neovascularization and the utility of topical VEGF inhibition: ranibizumab (Lucentis) vs bevacizumab (Avastin).

William Stevenson, Sheng-Fu Cheng, Mohammad H Dastjerdi, Giulio Ferrari, Reza Dana

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The ocular surface, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02797704 (The Effect of Subconjunctival Aflibercept on Regression of Corneal Neovascularization), which is not on this map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02797704 phase1 / phase2terminatednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Subconjunctival Aflibercept on Regression of Corneal Neovascularization

TypeinterventionalSponsorRabin Medical CenterRan2017 to 2019Enrolled6ConditionsCorneal NeovascularizationArmsAflibercept
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Genome Editing VEGFA Prevents Corneal Neovascularization In Vivo.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  18. Available Therapeutic Options for Corneal Neovascularization: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

William StevensonSchepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Sheng-Fu Cheng
Mohammad H Dastjerdi
Giulio Ferrari
Reza Dana
Fondazione G.B. Bietti · ITHarvard University · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · US

Funding

MECHANISMS OF SENSITIZATION IN HIGH-RISK CORNEAL GRAFTSR01EY012963 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI DANA, REZA · 2000 to 2025
$15.1M
New Strategies for Modulation of Corneal and Ocular Surface InflammationK24EY019098 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI DANA, REZA · 2008 to 2012
$594k
NEI NIH HHS EY-12963NEI NIH HHS EY-19098NEI NIH HHS K24 EY019098NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012963
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corneal avascularity is necessary for the preservation of optimal vision. The cornea maintains a dynamic balance between pro- and antiangiogenic factors that allows it to remain avascular under normal homeostatic conditions; however, corneal avascularity can be compromised by pathologic conditions that negate the cornea's "angiogenic privilege." The clinical relevance of corneal neovascularization has long been recognized, but management of this condition has been hindered by a lack of safe and effective therapeutic modalities. Herein, the etiology, epidemiology, pathogenesis, and treatment of corneal neovascularization are reviewed. Additionally, the authors' recent findings regarding the clinical utility of topical ranibizumab (Lucentis®) and bevacizumab (Avastin®) in the treatment of corneal neovascularization are summarized. These findings clearly indicate that ranibizumab and bevacizumab are safe and effective treatments for corneal neovascularization when appropriate precautions are observed. Although direct comparisons are not conclusive, the results suggest that ranibizumab may be modestly superior to bevacizumab in terms of both onset of action and degree of efficacy. In order to justify the increased cost of ranibizumab, it will be necessary to demonstrate meaningful treatment superiority in a prospective, randomized, head-to-head comparison study.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabCorneal NeovascularizationCorneal TransplantationHumansRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22482468
PMCPMC3471139
OpenAlexW1996802631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.