Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22480918›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2012

Pathway analysis of genomic data: concepts, methods, and prospects for future development.

Vijay K Ramanan, Li Shen, Jason H Moore, Andrew J Saykin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pathway Analysis Interpretation in the Multi-Omic Era.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The Use of AI for Phenotype-Genotype Mapping.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Descriptor:IEEE data descriptions · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. PHENSIM: Phenotype Simulator.PLoS computational biology · 2021
    Article

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vijay K RamananDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Li Shen
Jason H Moore
Andrew J Saykin

Funding

Project 1U19AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI Duygu Tosun-Turgut · 2016 to 2026
$226.7M
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Alzheimer's Disease Genetics ConsortiumU01AG032984 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SCHELLENBERG, GERARD DAVID · 2009 to 2024
$60.4M
Research Education ComponentP30AG010133 · NIA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI SAYKIN, ANDREW J · 1991 to 2020
$37.3M
Amyloid Imaging, VMCI, and Analysis for ADNIRC2AG036535 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2009 to 2010
$23.8M
Quantitative Biology Research InstituteP20GM103534 · NIGMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI AMOS, CHRISTOPHER I. · 2012 to 2016
$8.6M
Memory Circuitry in MCI and Early Alzheimer’s Disease Prodrome: Molecular DriversR01AG019771 · NIA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI SAYKIN, ANDREW J · 2001 to 2021
$6.9M
Indiana Medical Scientist/Engineer Training ProgramT32GM077229 · NIGMS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI GASTON, BENJAMIN, HERBERT, BRITTNEY-SHEA · 2008 to 2022
$6.0M
Bioinformatics Strategies for Genome-Wide Association StudiesR01LM010098 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MOORE, JASON H., WILLIAMS, SCOTT MATTHEW · 2009 to 2023
$5.1M
Bioinformatics Strategies: Biodefense Vaccine ResearchR01AI059694 · NIAID · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI MOORE, JASON H. · 2004 to 2012
$4.5M
Machine Learning Prediction of Cancer SusceptibilityR01LM009012 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MOORE, JASON H. · 2006 to 2014
$3.3M
Neural Mechanisms of Chemotherapy-Induced Cognitive DisorderR01CA101318 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI SAYKIN, ANDREW J · 2003 to 2007
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA101318NIAID NIH HHS AI59694NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI059694NIA NIH HHS AG024904NIA NIH HHS AG032984NIA NIH HHS AG036535NIA NIH HHS AG10133NIA NIH HHS AG19771NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010133NIA NIH HHS R01 AG019771NIA NIH HHS RC2 AG036535NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032984NIA NIH HHS U19 AG024904NIGMS NIH HHS GM077229-02NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103534NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM077229NLM NIH HHS LM009012NLM NIH HHS LM010098NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009012NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide data sets are increasingly being used to identify biological pathways and networks underlying complex diseases. In particular, analyzing genomic data through sets defined by functional pathways offers the potential of greater power for discovery and natural connections to biological mechanisms. With the burgeoning availability of next-generation sequencing, this is an opportune moment to revisit strategies for pathway-based analysis of genomic data. Here, we synthesize relevant concepts and extant methodologies to guide investigators in study design and execution. We also highlight ongoing challenges and proposed solutions. As relevant analytical strategies mature, pathways and networks will be ideally placed to integrate data from diverse -omics sources to harness the extensive, rich information related to disease and treatment mechanisms.

Indexed as

GenomeDatabases, GeneticGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsHumans

Identifiers

PMID22480918
PMCPMC3378813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.