Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22480168›Full record

ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2012

Diesel exhaust particulate induces pulmonary and systemic inflammation in rats without impairing endothelial function ex vivo or in vivo.

Sarah Robertson, Gillian A Gray, Rodger Duffin, Steven G McLean, Catherine A Shaw, Patrick W F Hadoke, David E Newby, Mark R Miller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Effects of ambient particulate matter on vascular tissue: a review.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2020
    Review
  12. Seasonal Variation in the Biological Effects of PMInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah RobertsonCentre of Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. srobertson@salud.unm.edu
Gillian A Gray
Rodger Duffin
Steven G McLean
Catherine A Shaw
Patrick W F Hadoke
David E Newby
Mark R Miller
University of Edinburgh · GBCentre for Inflammation Research · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/07/063British Heart Foundation PG/10/42/28388British Heart Foundation RG/05/003British Heart Foundation RG/10/9/28286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInhalation of diesel exhaust impairs vascular function in man, by a mechanism that has yet to be fully established. We hypothesised that pulmonary exposure to diesel exhaust particles (DEP) would cause endothelial dysfunction in rats as a consequence of pulmonary and systemic inflammation.

methodsWistar rats were exposed to DEP (0.5 mg) or saline vehicle by intratracheal instillation and hind-limb blood flow, blood pressure and heart rate were monitored in situ 6 or 24 h after exposure. Vascular function was tested by administration of the endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine (ACh) and the endothelium-independent vasodilator sodium nitroprusside (SNP) in vivo and ex vivo in isolated rings of thoracic aorta, femoral and mesenteric artery from DEP exposed rats. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and blood plasma were collected to assess pulmonary (cell differentials, protein levels & interleukin-6 (IL-6)) and systemic (IL-6), tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and C-reactive protein (CRP)) inflammation, respectively.

resultsDEP instillation increased cell counts, total protein and IL-6 in BALF 6 h after exposure, while levels of IL-6 and TNFα were only raised in blood 24 h after DEP exposure. DEP had no effect on the increased hind-limb blood flow induced by ACh in vivo at 6 or 24 h. However, responses to SNP were impaired at both time points. In contrast, ex vivo responses to ACh and SNP were unaltered in arteries isolated from rats exposed to DEP.

conclusionsExposure of rats to DEP induces both pulmonary and systemic inflammation, but does not modify endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. Other mechanisms in vivo limit dilator responses to SNP and these require further investigation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAorta, ThoracicBlood Cell CountBlood PlateletsBlood PressureBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCell DifferentiationC-Reactive ProteinEndothelium-Dependent Relaxing FactorsEndothelium, VascularErythrocytesFemoral ArteryHeart RateInterleukin-6In Vitro TechniquesLeukocytesC-Reactive ProteinEndothelium-Dependent Relaxing FactorsInterleukin-6Particulate MatterTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaVehicle Emissions

Identifiers

PMID22480168
PMCPMC3361483
OpenAlexW2108419567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.