ArticlePloS one2012
Pathogen-specific circulating plasmablasts in patients with pneumonia.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A cell-based in vitro assay for testing of immunological integrity of Tetanus toxoid vaccine antigen.NPJ vaccines · 2021Article
- Assessment of an Antibody-in-Lymphocyte Supernatant Assay for the Etiological Diagnosis of Pneumococcal Pneumonia in Children.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019Article
- The Antibody-Secreting Cell Response to Infection: Kinetics and Clinical Applications.Frontiers in immunology · 2017Review
- Article
- Differences in Homing Potentials of Streptococcus pneumoniae-Specific Plasmablasts in Pneumococcal Pneumonia and After Pneumococcal Polysaccharide and Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccinations.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) are the leading cause of death world-wide, with Streptococcus pneumoniae (Pnc) as the most prevalent pathogen. Local immune mechanisms appear central to protection against the disease, yet they are poorly characterized. Infections at other, non-respiratory mucosal sites are associated with a transient circulation of mucosa-originating lymphocytes from the mucosal site to blood and back to the mucosa. The present study explored whether pathogen-specific plasmablasts appear in the circulation also in patients with infection of the lower respiratory tract. 16 patients with bacteremic Pnc pneumonia and 14 healthy volunteers were explored for circulating plasmablasts secreting antibodies against their own pathogenic Pnc strain isolated in blood cultures (patients) or against several pathogenic strains from pneumonia patients (14 controls) or a mixture of nine different purified pneumococcal polysaccharides (8 controls). Both patients and volunteers were studied for all plasmablasts. The cells were identified with ELISPOT as Pnc-specific antibody-secreting cells (ASC) and as all immunoglobulin-secreting cells (ISC). High numbers of circulating Pnc-specific ASC were found in the acute phase of the disease in all patients with pneumonia (median 97 ASC/10(6) PBMC), but in none of the controls. IgG isotype predominated in 9/16 patients. The numbers of ISC were significantly higher in the patients than in the healthy controls, yet Pnc-specific ASC only accounted for 0.7% of all the patients' ISC.The present study is the first to show that antigen-specific plasmablasts appear in the circulation in pneumonia, suggesting that pulmonary lypmhocytes recirculate in humans. Assessing these cells provides a novel tool for studying immune response to antigens encountered at the LRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.