Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22479598›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

A mathematical model for interpretable clinical decision support with applications in gynecology.

Vanya M C A Van Belle, Ben Van Calster, Dirk Timmerman, Tom Bourne, Cecilia Bottomley, Lil Valentin, Patrick Neven, Sabine Van Huffel, Johan A K Suykens, Stephen Boyd

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02623400 (The Effect of Perinatal Stress on the Development of Preterm Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02623400 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Perinatal Stress on the Development of Preterm Infants

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenRan2016 to 2025Enrolled174ConditionsPremature Birth of Newborn
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Fused Lasso Additive Model.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vanya M C A Van BelleDepartment of Electrical Engineering (ESAT-SCD), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. vanya.vanbelle@esat.kuleuven.be
Ben Van Calster
Dirk Timmerman
Tom Bourne
Cecilia Bottomley
Lil Valentin
Patrick Neven
Sabine Van Huffel
Johan A K Suykens
Stephen Boyd

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver time, methods for the development of clinical decision support (CDS) systems have evolved from interpretable and easy-to-use scoring systems to very complex and non-interpretable mathematical models. In order to accomplish effective decision support, CDS systems should provide information on how the model arrives at a certain decision. To address the issue of incompatibility between performance, interpretability and applicability of CDS systems, this paper proposes an innovative model structure, automatically leading to interpretable and easily applicable models. The resulting models can be used to guide clinicians when deciding upon the appropriate treatment, estimating patient-specific risks and to improve communication with patients. METHODS AND

findingsWe propose the interval coded scoring (ICS) system, which imposes that the effect of each variable on the estimated risk is constant within consecutive intervals. The number and position of the intervals are automatically obtained by solving an optimization problem, which additionally performs variable selection. The resulting model can be visualised by means of appealing scoring tables and color bars. ICS models can be used within software packages, in smartphone applications, or on paper, which is particularly useful for bedside medicine and home-monitoring. The ICS approach is illustrated on two gynecological problems: diagnosis of malignancy of ovarian tumors using a dataset containing 3,511 patients, and prediction of first trimester viability of pregnancies using a dataset of 1,435 women. Comparison of the performance of the ICS approach with a range of prediction models proposed in the literature illustrates the ability of ICS to combine optimal performance with the interpretability of simple scoring systems.

conclusionsThe ICS approach can improve patient-clinician communication and will provide additional insights in the importance and influence of available variables. Future challenges include extensions of the proposed methodology towards automated detection of interaction effects, multi-class decision support systems, prognosis and high-dimensional data.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalAdnexal DiseasesAlgorithmsCommunicationComputer SimulationDecision Support TechniquesExpert SystemsFemaleGynecologyHumansModels, TheoreticalObstetricsPhysician-Patient RelationsPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID22479598
PMCPMC3315538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.