Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22479511›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Response of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to amicoumacin A.

Amrita Lama, Jan Pané-Farré, Tai Chon, Anna M Wiersma, Clarissa S Sit, John C Vederas, Michael Hecker, Michiko M Nakano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. In vivo virulence ofJTCVS open · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. AntimicrobialAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mechanism of the Potential Therapeutic CandidateFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  12. Antimicrobial Activity and Mechanism of Action ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Activating and Attenuating the Amicoumacin Antibiotics.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. StaphyloBase: a specialized genomic resource for the staphylococcal research community.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Amrita LamaDivision of Environmental and Biomolecular Systems, Institute of Environmental Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, Oregon, United States of America.
Jan Pané-Farré
Tai Chon
Anna M Wiersma
Clarissa S Sit
John C Vederas
Michael Hecker
Michiko M Nakano
Oregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversität Greifswald · DE

Funding

Anti-MRSA activity of a Bacillus pumilus natural isolateR21AI081025 · NIAID · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI NAKANO, MICHIKO M · 2009 to 2010
$416k
NIAID NIH HHS AI081025NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI081025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amicoumacin A exhibits strong antimicrobial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), hence we sought to uncover its mechanism of action. Genome-wide transcriptome analysis of S. aureus COL in response to amicoumacin A showed alteration in transcription of genes specifying several cellular processes including cell envelope turnover, cross-membrane transport, virulence, metabolism, and general stress response. The most highly induced gene was lrgA, encoding an antiholin-like product, which is induced in cells undergoing a collapse of Δψ. Consistent with the notion that LrgA modulates murein hydrolase activity, COL grown in the presence of amicoumacin A showed reduced autolysis, which was primarily caused by lower hydrolase activity. To gain further insight into the mechanism of action of amicoumacin A, a whole genome comparison of wild-type COL and amicoumacin A-resistant mutants isolated by a serial passage method was carried out. Single point mutations generating codon substitutions were uncovered in ksgA (encoding RNA dimethyltransferase), fusA (elongation factor G), dnaG (primase), lacD (tagatose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase), and SACOL0611 (a putative glycosyl transferase). The codon substitutions in EF-G that cause amicoumacin A resistance and fusidic acid resistance reside in separate domains and do not bring about cross resistance. Taken together, these results suggest that amicoumacin A might cause perturbation of the cell membrane and lead to energy dissipation. Decreased rates of cellular metabolism including protein synthesis and DNA replication in resistant strains might allow cells to compensate for membrane dysfunction and thus increase cell survivability.

Indexed as

Aldehyde-LyasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCell MembraneCell SurvivalCodonCoumarinsDNA PrimaseDrug Resistance, BacterialFusidic AcidMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMethyltransferasesModels, BiologicalOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPeptide Elongation Factor GPoint Mutation16S rRNA (adenine(1518)-N(6)-adenine(1519)-N(6))-dimethyltransferaseAldehyde-Lyasesamicoumacin AAnti-Bacterial AgentsCodonCoumarinsDNA PrimaseFusidic AcidMethyltransferasesPeptide Elongation Factor Gtagatose 1,6-diphosphate aldolase

Identifiers

PMID22479511
PMCPMC3316591
OpenAlexW2034228411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.