ArticlePloS one2012
Comprehensive decision tree models in bioinformatics.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence in Bariatric Surgery: Current Status and Future Perspectives.Obesity surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders using artificial intelligence technologies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Neural Network-Based System for Rapid Diagnostic Decision Support Using FLIM Data: Segmentation and Classification in Liver, Skin, and Pancreatic Tissues.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Machine learning approaches for predicting the link of the global trade network of liquefied natural gas.PloS one · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Approaches for Assessing Risk Factors of Adrenal Insufficiency in Patients Undergoing Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Descriptive forest: experiments on a novel tree-structure-generalization method for describing cardiovascular diseases.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Improved downstream functional analysis of single-cell RNA-sequence data using DGAN.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Extracting New Temporal Features to Improve the Interpretability of Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Prediction Models.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Unbox the black-box for the medical explainable AI via multi-modal and multi-centre data fusion: A mini-review, two showcases and beyond.An international journal on information fusion · 2022Article
- An Adaptive Rank Aggregation-Based Ensemble Multi-Filter Feature Selection Method in Software Defect Prediction.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- External validation of a prediction model and decision tree for sickness absence due to mental disorders.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2020Article
- Development of Prediction Models for Sickness Absence Due to Mental Disorders in the General Working Population.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2020Article
- Explainable artificial intelligence models using real-world electronic health record data: a systematic scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Article
- Rough set theory based prognostic classification models for hospice referral.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2015Article
- Comprehensible Predictive Modeling Using Regularized Logistic Regression and Comorbidity Based Features.PloS one · 2015Article
- Evaluation of Major Online Diabetes Risk Calculators and Computerized Predictive Models.PloS one · 2015Article
- Reconciliation of Decision-Making Heuristics Based on Decision Trees Topologies and Incomplete Fuzzy Probabilities Sets.PloS one · 2015Article
- A review of machine learning methods to predict the solubility of overexpressed recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Chemokine profile in the sera and urine of patients with schistosomal glomerulopathy.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeClassification is an important and widely used machine learning technique in bioinformatics. Researchers and other end-users of machine learning software often prefer to work with comprehensible models where knowledge extraction and explanation of reasoning behind the classification model are possible.
methodsThis paper presents an extension to an existing machine learning environment and a study on visual tuning of decision tree classifiers. The motivation for this research comes from the need to build effective and easily interpretable decision tree models by so called one-button data mining approach where no parameter tuning is needed. To avoid bias in classification, no classification performance measure is used during the tuning of the model that is constrained exclusively by the dimensions of the produced decision tree.
resultsThe proposed visual tuning of decision trees was evaluated on 40 datasets containing classical machine learning problems and 31 datasets from the field of bioinformatics. Although we did not expected significant differences in classification performance, the results demonstrate a significant increase of accuracy in less complex visually tuned decision trees. In contrast to classical machine learning benchmarking datasets, we observe higher accuracy gains in bioinformatics datasets. Additionally, a user study was carried out to confirm the assumption that the tree tuning times are significantly lower for the proposed method in comparison to manual tuning of the decision tree.
conclusionsThe empirical results demonstrate that by building simple models constrained by predefined visual boundaries, one not only achieves good comprehensibility, but also very good classification performance that does not differ from usually more complex models built using default settings of the classical decision tree algorithm. In addition, our study demonstrates the suitability of visually tuned decision trees for datasets with binary class attributes and a high number of possibly redundant attributes that are very common in bioinformatics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.