Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22479378›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2012

Evaluation of genetic mutations associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance to amikacin, kanamycin and capreomycin: a systematic review.

Sophia B Georghiou, Marisa Magana, Richard S Garfein, Donald G Catanzaro, Antonino Catanzaro, Timothy C Rodwell

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 246 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A Comprehensive Review of Genetic Mechanisms ofInfection and drug resistance · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sophia B GeorghiouDepartment of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Marisa Magana
Richard S Garfein
Donald G Catanzaro
Antonino Catanzaro
Timothy C Rodwell
University of California, San Diego · USUniversity of California San Diego Medical Center · USScripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Rapid Tests for Drug Resistance to Detect Extensively Drug-Resistant TuberculosisU01AI082229 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CATANZARO, ANTONINO · 2009 to 2013
$10.9M
Binational Transmission of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis, California & MexicoK01AI083784 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI RODWELL, TIMOTHY CHARLES · 2009 to 2012
$487k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI083784NIAID NIH HHS K01AI083784NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI082229NIAID NIH HHS U01AI082229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid molecular diagnostics for detecting multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (M/XDR-TB) primarily identify mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) genes associated with drug resistance. Their accuracy, however, is dependent largely on the strength of the association between a specific mutation and the phenotypic resistance of the isolate with that mutation, which is not always 100%. While this relationship is well established and reliable for first-line anti-TB drugs, rifampin and isoniazid, it is less well-studied and understood for second-line, injectable drugs, amikacin (AMK), kanamycin (KAN) and capreomycin (CAP). METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe conducted a systematic review of all published studies evaluating Mtb mutations associated with resistance to AMK, KAN, CAP in order to characterize the diversity and frequency of mutations as well as describe the strength of the association between specific mutations and phenotypic resistance in global populations. Our objective was to determine the potential utility and reliability of these mutations as diagnostic markers for detecting AMK, KAN and CAP resistance. Mutation data was reviewed for 1,585 unique clinical isolates from four continents and over 18 countries. Mutations in the rrs, tlyA, eis promoter and gidB genes were associated with AMK, KAN and/or CAP resistance. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The rrs A1401G mutation was present in the majority of AMK, KAN and CAP resistant Mtb strains reviewed, but was also found in 7% of CAP susceptible strains. The 1401 mutation alone, however, was not found with sufficient frequency to detect more than 70-80% of global Mtb strains resistant to AMK and CAP, and 60% of strains resistant to KAN. Additional mutations in the rrs, eis promoter, tlyA and gidB genes appear to be associated with resistance and could improve sensitivity and specificity of future diagnostics.

Indexed as

MutationAcetyltransferasesAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsCapreomycinDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHumansKanamycinMethyltransferasesMycobacterium tuberculosisPromoter Regions, GeneticTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantAcetyltransferasesAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsCapreomycinEis protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosisKanamycinMethyltransferasesTlyA protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID22479378
PMCPMC3315572
OpenAlexW2090070686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.