Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22479338›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Priming with a recombinant pantothenate auxotroph of Mycobacterium bovis BCG and boosting with MVA elicits HIV-1 Gag specific CD8+ T cells.

Rosamund Chapman, Enid Shephard, Helen Stutz, Nicola Douglass, Vasan Sambandamurthy, Irene Garcia, Bernhard Ryffel, William Jacobs, Anna-Lise Williamson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. RecombinantVaccines · 2025
    Review
  2. AuxotrophicVaccines · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Journal of clinical & cellular immunology · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Rosamund ChapmanInstitute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Enid Shephard
Helen Stutz
Nicola Douglass
Vasan Sambandamurthy
Irene Garcia
Bernhard Ryffel
William Jacobs
Anna-Lise Williamson
University of Cape Town · ZAAstraZeneca (India) · INCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USNational Health Laboratory Service · ZASouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

"The Tuberculous Granuloma"P01AI063537 · NIAID · ALBERT EINSTEIN COL OF MED YESHIVA UNIV · PI CHAN, JOHN R. · 2005 to 2015
$15.7M
BCG as an HIV vaccine vectorR33AI073182 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN · PI WILLIAMSON, ANNA-LISE · 2009 to 2011
$961k
NIAID NIH HHS 5R33AI73182-4NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI063537NIAID NIH HHS R33 AI073182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A safe and effective HIV vaccine is required to significantly reduce the number of people becoming infected with HIV each year. In this study wild type Mycobacterium bovis BCG Pasteur and an attenuated pantothenate auxotroph strain (BCGΔpanCD) that is safe in SCID mice, have been compared as vaccine vectors for HIV-1 subtype C Gag. Genetically stable vaccines BCG[pHS400] (BCG-Gag) and BCGΔpanCD[pHS400] (BCGpan-Gag) were generated using the Pasteur strain of BCG, and a panothenate auxotroph of Pasteur respectively. Stability was achieved by the use of a codon optimised gag gene and deletion of the hsp60-lysA promoter-gene cassette from the episomal vector pCB119. In this vector expression of gag is driven by the mtrA promoter and the Gag protein is fused to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis 19 kDa signal sequence. Both BCG-Gag and BCGpan-Gag primed the immune system of BALB/c mice for a boost with a recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara expressing Gag (MVA-Gag). After the boost high frequencies of predominantly Gag-specific CD8(+) T cells were detected when BCGpan-Gag was the prime in contrast to induction of predominantly Gag-specific CD4(+) T cells when priming with BCG-Gag. The differing Gag-specific T-cell phenotype elicited by the prime-boost regimens may be related to the reduced inflammation observed with the pantothenate auxotroph strain compared to the parent strain. These features make BCGpan-Gag a more desirable HIV vaccine candidate than BCG-Gag. Although no Gag-specific cells could be detected after vaccination of BALB/c mice with either recombinant BCG vaccine alone, BCGpan-Gag protected mice against a surrogate vaccinia virus challenge.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAnimalsBCG VaccineCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayGene Products, gagHIV-1HIV InfectionsImmunization, SecondaryInterferon-gammaInterleukin-6MiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, SCIDMycobacterium bovisPantothenic AcidAIDS VaccinesBCG VaccineGene Products, gagInterferon-gammaInterleukin-6Pantothenic AcidTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID22479338
PMCPMC3315557
OpenAlexW2161108894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.