Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22479332›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Development of an in vitro model for the multi-parametric quantification of the cellular interactions between Candida yeasts and phagocytes.

Karine Dementhon, Sofiane El-Kirat-Chatel, Thierry Noël

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Microorganisms · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Divergent Approaches to Virulence inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Microevolution of the pathogenic yeastsMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. TOM1 Regulates Neuronal Accumulation of Amyloid-β Oligomers by FcγRIIb2 Variant in Alzheimer's Disease.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Fungal Strategies to Evade the Host Immune Recognition.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Review
  15. Modelling the host-pathogen interactions of macrophages andJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017
    Article
  16. Frontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Disruption of Protein Mannosylation AffectsFrontiers in microbiology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karine DementhonUniversité Bordeaux, Microbiologie Fondamentale et Pathogénicité, UMR 5234, Bordeaux, France.
Sofiane El-Kirat-Chatel
Thierry Noël

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a new in vitro model for a multi-parameter characterization of the time course interaction of Candida fungal cells with J774 murine macrophages and human neutrophils, based on the use of combined microscopy, fluorometry, flow cytometry and viability assays. Using fluorochromes specific to phagocytes and yeasts, we could accurately quantify various parameters simultaneously in a single infection experiment: at the individual cell level, we measured the association of phagocytes to fungal cells and phagocyte survival, and monitored in parallel the overall phagocytosis process by measuring the part of ingested fungal cells among the total fungal biomass that changed over time. Candida albicans, C. glabrata, and C. lusitaniae were used as a proof of concept: they exhibited species-specific differences in their association rate with phagocytes. The fungal biomass uptaken by the phagocytes differed significantly according to the Candida species. The measure of the survival of fungal and immune cells during the interaction showed that C. albicans was the more aggressive yeast in vitro, destroying the vast majority of the phagocytes within five hours. All three species of Candida were able to survive and to escape macrophage phagocytosis either by the intraphagocytic yeast-to-hyphae transition (C. albicans) and the fungal cell multiplication until phagocytes burst (C. glabrata, C. lusitaniae), or by the avoidance of phagocytosis (C. lusitaniae). We demonstrated that our model was sensitive enough to quantify small variations of the parameters of the interaction. The method has been conceived to be amenable to the high-throughput screening of mutants in order to unravel the molecular mechanisms involved in the interaction between yeasts and host phagocytes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCandidaCandida albicansCell LineCells, CulturedCell SurvivalFlow CytometryFluorometryHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansKineticsMacrophagesMicrobial ViabilityMicroscopy, FluorescenceMicroscopy, VideoModels, Immunological

Identifiers

PMID22479332
PMCPMC3316538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.