Trial reportPloS one2012
Walking is not like reaching: evidence from periodic mechanical perturbations.
Trial report in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms of gait phase entrainment in healthy subjects during rhythmic electrical stimulation of the medial gastrocnemius.PloS one · 2020Trial
- Dynamic stability and stepping strategies of young healthy adults walking on an oscillating treadmill.PloS one · 2019Trial
- Effects of periodic sensory perturbations during electrical stimulation on gait cycle period.PloS one · 2018Trial
- The critical phase for visual control of human walking over complex terrain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Trial
- Obesity is linked to impaired sensorimotor synchronization during walking but not tapping.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Biomechanical models in the lower-limb exoskeletons development: a review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Amplitude and frequency of human gait synchronization with a machine oscillator system.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Continuous neural control of a bionic limb restores biomimetic gait after amputation.Nature medicine · 2024Article
- Wearable robot helps man with Parkinson's disease to walk.Nature medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Gait parameters when walking with or without rollator on different surface characteristics: a pilot study among healthy individuals.BMC research notes · 2022Article
- Evaluating the energetics of entrainment in a human-machine coupled oscillator system.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Functional Resistance Training to Improve Knee Strength and Function After Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Case Study.Sports health · 2021Article
- Multiple strategies to correct errors in foot placement and control speed in human walking.Experimental brain research · 2020Article
- Wearable haptic anklets for gait and freezing improvement in Parkinson's disease: a proof-of-concept study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020Article
- Closing the Loop on Exoskeleton Motor Controllers: Benefits of Regression-Based Open-Loop Control.IEEE robotics and automation letters · 2020Article
- Control of goal-directed movements within (or beyond) reach?: Comment on "Muscleless motor synergies and actions without movements: From motor neuroscience to cognitive robotics" by Vishwanathan Mohan et al.Physics of life reviews · 2019Article
- The effect of stride length on lower extremity joint kinetics at various gait speeds.PloS one · 2019Article
- Treadmill vs. overground walking: different response to physical interaction.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The control architecture underlying human reaching has been established, at least in broad outline. However, despite extensive research, the control architecture underlying human locomotion remains unclear. Some studies show evidence of high-level control focused on lower-limb trajectories; others suggest that nonlinear oscillators such as lower-level rhythmic central pattern generators (CPGs) play a significant role. To resolve this ambiguity, we reasoned that if a nonlinear oscillator contributes to locomotor control, human walking should exhibit dynamic entrainment to periodic mechanical perturbation; entrainment is a distinctive behavior of nonlinear oscillators. Here we present the first behavioral evidence that nonlinear neuro-mechanical oscillators contribute to the production of human walking, albeit weakly. As unimpaired human subjects walked at constant speed, we applied periodic torque pulses to the ankle at periods different from their preferred cadence. The gait period of 18 out of 19 subjects entrained to this mechanical perturbation, converging to match that of the perturbation. Significantly, entrainment occurred only if the perturbation period was close to subjects' preferred walking cadence: it exhibited a narrow basin of entrainment. Further, regardless of the phase within the walking cycle at which perturbation was initiated, subjects' gait synchronized or phase-locked with the mechanical perturbation at a phase of gait where it assisted propulsion. These results were affected neither by auditory feedback nor by a distractor task. However, the convergence to phase-locking was slow. These characteristics indicate that nonlinear neuro-mechanical oscillators make at most a modest contribution to human walking. Our results suggest that human locomotor control is not organized as in reaching to meet a predominantly kinematic specification, but is hierarchically organized with a semi-autonomous peripheral oscillator operating under episodic supervisory control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.