ArticlePLoS genetics2012
Accurate prediction of inducible transcription factor binding intensities in vivo.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting the host transcription factor HSF1 prevents human cytomegalovirus replication in vitro and in vivo.Antiviral research · 2025Article
- Heat shock factor 1 directly regulates transsulfuration pathway to promote prostate cancer proliferation and survival.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Correction of transposase sequence bias in ATAC-seq data with rule ensemble modeling.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Article
- PredTAD: A machine learning framework that models 3D chromatin organization alterations leading to oncogene dysregulation in breast cancer cell lines.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Sequence and chromatin determinants of transcription factor binding and the establishment of cell type-specific binding patterns.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Gene regulatory mechanisms · 2020Review
- ChIPulate: A comprehensive ChIP-seq simulation pipeline.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Article
- Shared nucleotide flanks confer transcriptional competency to bZip core motifs.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Integrated omics approaches to characterize a nuclear receptor corepressor-associated histone deacetylase in mouse skeletal muscle.Molecular and cellular endocrinology · 2018Review
- Parallel factor ChIP provides essential internal control for quantitative differential ChIP-seq.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Genome-wide determinants of sequence-specific DNA binding of general regulatory factors.Genome research · 2018Article
- Detection of cooperatively bound transcription factor pairs using ChIP-seq peak intensities and expectation maximization.PloS one · 2018Article
- Identification of breast cancer associated variants that modulate transcription factor binding.PLoS genetics · 2017Article
- Histone locus regulation by theGenes & development · 2017Article
- Genome-Wide Dissection of the Heat Shock Transcription Factor Family Genes inFrontiers in plant science · 2017Article
- E2F coregulates an essential HSF developmental program that is distinct from the heat-shock response.Genes & development · 2016Article
- Article
- Article
- Structures of HSF2 reveal mechanisms for differential regulation of human heat-shock factors.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
DNA sequence and local chromatin landscape act jointly to determine transcription factor (TF) binding intensity profiles. To disentangle these influences, we developed an experimental approach, called protein/DNA binding followed by high-throughput sequencing (PB-seq), that allows the binding energy landscape to be characterized genome-wide in the absence of chromatin. We applied our methods to the Drosophila Heat Shock Factor (HSF), which inducibly binds a target DNA sequence element (HSE) following heat shock stress. PB-seq involves incubating sheared naked genomic DNA with recombinant HSF, partitioning the HSF-bound and HSF-free DNA, and then detecting HSF-bound DNA by high-throughput sequencing. We compared PB-seq binding profiles with ones observed in vivo by ChIP-seq and developed statistical models to predict the observed departures from idealized binding patterns based on covariates describing the local chromatin environment. We found that DNase I hypersensitivity and tetra-acetylation of H4 were the most influential covariates in predicting changes in HSF binding affinity. We also investigated the extent to which DNA accessibility, as measured by digital DNase I footprinting data, could be predicted from MNase-seq data and the ChIP-chip profiles for many histone modifications and TFs, and found GAGA element associated factor (GAF), tetra-acetylation of H4, and H4K16 acetylation to be the most predictive covariates. Lastly, we generated an unbiased model of HSF binding sequences, which revealed distinct biophysical properties of the HSF/HSE interaction and a previously unrecognized substructure within the HSE. These findings provide new insights into the interplay between the genomic sequence and the chromatin landscape in determining transcription factor binding intensity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.