Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22479205›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2012

Accurate prediction of inducible transcription factor binding intensities in vivo.

Michael J Guertin, André L Martins, Adam Siepel, John T Lis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Histone locus regulation by theGenes & development · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael J GuertinDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
André L Martins
Adam Siepel
John T Lis
Cornell University · US

Funding

COORDINATE GENE REGULATION IN ANIMAL CELLSR01GM025232 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI LIS, JOHN T · 1985 to 2020
$8.4M
PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN GENETICS AND DEVELOPMENTT32GM007617 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI BARBASH, DANIEL A · 1985 to 2021
$5.5M
COORDINATE GENE REGULATION IN ANIMAL CELLSR37GM025232 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI LIS, JOHN THOMAS · 1995 to 2004
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM25232NIGMS NIH HHS GM25232-S1NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM025232NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM025232NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007617NIGMS NIH HHS T32-GM007617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA sequence and local chromatin landscape act jointly to determine transcription factor (TF) binding intensity profiles. To disentangle these influences, we developed an experimental approach, called protein/DNA binding followed by high-throughput sequencing (PB-seq), that allows the binding energy landscape to be characterized genome-wide in the absence of chromatin. We applied our methods to the Drosophila Heat Shock Factor (HSF), which inducibly binds a target DNA sequence element (HSE) following heat shock stress. PB-seq involves incubating sheared naked genomic DNA with recombinant HSF, partitioning the HSF-bound and HSF-free DNA, and then detecting HSF-bound DNA by high-throughput sequencing. We compared PB-seq binding profiles with ones observed in vivo by ChIP-seq and developed statistical models to predict the observed departures from idealized binding patterns based on covariates describing the local chromatin environment. We found that DNase I hypersensitivity and tetra-acetylation of H4 were the most influential covariates in predicting changes in HSF binding affinity. We also investigated the extent to which DNA accessibility, as measured by digital DNase I footprinting data, could be predicted from MNase-seq data and the ChIP-chip profiles for many histone modifications and TFs, and found GAGA element associated factor (GAF), tetra-acetylation of H4, and H4K16 acetylation to be the most predictive covariates. Lastly, we generated an unbiased model of HSF binding sequences, which revealed distinct biophysical properties of the HSF/HSE interaction and a previously unrecognized substructure within the HSE. These findings provide new insights into the interplay between the genomic sequence and the chromatin landscape in determining transcription factor binding intensity.

Indexed as

ChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsAcetylationAnimalsBinding SitesDeoxyribonuclease IGene Expression RegulationGenome, InsectHeat-Shock ResponseHeat Shock Transcription FactorsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHistonesTranscriptional ActivationTranscription FactorsChromatinDeoxyribonuclease IDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsHeat Shock Transcription FactorsHistonesHsf protein, DrosophilaTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID22479205
PMCPMC3315474
OpenAlexW2006196853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.