ArticlePLoS computational biology2012
Topic pages: PLoS Computational Biology meets Wikipedia.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Closing the computational biology 'knowledge gap': Spanish Wikipedia as a case study.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Characterizing domain-specific open educational resources by linking ISCB Communities of Special Interest to Wikipedia.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Evolution of Wikipedia's medical content: past, present and future.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2017Article
- The International Society for Computational Biology and WikiProject Computational Biology: celebrating 10 years of collaboration towards open access.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review.F1000Research · 2017Review
- On the origin of nonequivalent states: How we can talk about preprints.F1000Research · 2017Article
- Medical publishing in a digital world: New World, new standards?Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.