ArticlePLoS computational biology2012
Thermodynamic state ensemble models of cis-regulation.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combining in vitro and in silico approaches to model neural tube patterning and isthmic organizer formation.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Core elements play distinct roles in promoter birth and transcriptional regulation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Informational blueprints reveal condition-dependent gene regulatory architectures.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The Dynamics of Inducible Genetic Circuits.ArXiv · 2026Article
- Evolution of dominance in a Mendelian trait is linked to the evolution of environmental plasticity.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2026Article
- Quantitative modulation of a spatial enhancer through the biophysical properties of a transcription factor binding site.Science advances · 2026Article
- Mapping single-cell diploid chromatin fiber architectures using DAF-seq.Nature biotechnology · 2025Article
- Gene regulatory logic of the interferon-β enhancer is characterized by two selectively deployed modes of transcription factor synergy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Evolution of dominance in a Mendelian trait is linked to the evolution of environmental plasticity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- From genes to patterns: a framework for modeling the emergence of embryonic development from transcriptional regulation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- InterpretingNature machine intelligence · 2024Article
- The Hill function is the universal Hopfield barrier for sharpness of input-output responses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- The Hill function is the universal Hopfield barrier for sharpness of input-output responses.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- InterpretingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Transcription factor interactions explain the context-dependent activity of CRX binding sites.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- The Drosophila ecdysone receptor promotes or suppresses proliferation according to ligand level.Developmental cell · 2023Article
- Minimal synthetic enhancers reveal control of the probability of transcriptional engagement and its timing by a morphogen gradient.Cell systems · 2023Article
- Article
- Concentration-dependent transcriptional switching through a collective action of cis-elements.Science advances · 2022Article
- MAVE-NN: learning genotype-phenotype maps from multiplex assays of variant effect.Genome biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A major goal in computational biology is to develop models that accurately predict a gene's expression from its surrounding regulatory DNA. Here we present one class of such models, thermodynamic state ensemble models. We describe the biochemical derivation of the thermodynamic framework in simple terms, and lay out the mathematical components that comprise each model. These components include (1) the possible states of a promoter, where a state is defined as a particular arrangement of transcription factors bound to a DNA promoter, (2) the binding constants that describe the affinity of the protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions that occur in each state, and (3) whether each state is capable of transcribing. Using these components, we demonstrate how to compute a cis-regulatory function that encodes the probability of a promoter being active. Our intention is to provide enough detail so that readers with little background in thermodynamics can compose their own cis-regulatory functions. To facilitate this goal, we also describe a matrix form of the model that can be easily coded in any programming language. This formalism has great flexibility, which we show by illustrating how phenomena such as competition between transcription factors and cooperativity are readily incorporated into these models. Using this framework, we also demonstrate that Michaelis-like functions, another class of cis-regulatory models, are a subset of the thermodynamic framework with specific assumptions. By recasting Michaelis-like functions as thermodynamic functions, we emphasize the relationship between these models and delineate the specific circumstances representable by each approach. Application of thermodynamic state ensemble models is likely to be an important tool in unraveling the physical basis of combinatorial cis-regulation and in generating formalisms that accurately predict gene expression from DNA sequence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.